SUNSHINE HATCHERIES PRIVATE LIMITED,BHOPAL vs. DCIT/ACIT,5(1),, BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had failed to adjudicate the assessee's ground regarding the land not being a capital asset. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on all grounds.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold agricultural land and offered capital gains. The AO noted a difference between the sale consideration and the stamp duty valuation. The assessee claimed the land was rural agricultural land and thus not a capital asset, but the AO rejected this without a revised return.
What were the issues?
Whether the agricultural land sold was a capital asset, and whether the CIT(A) properly adjudicated all grounds raised by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 45,Section 2(14),Section 50C,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by the order of first-appeal dated 17.07.2025 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of the assessment-order dated 23.04.2021 passed by learned National e-Assessment Centre [“Ld. AO”] u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2018-19, the assessee has filed this appeal on following grounds:
Sunshine Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. ITA No. 651/Ind/2025 - AY 2018-19 “1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Id. CIT(A) erred and not justified and not adjudicating the claim of the ass
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 45
- Mukesh Mishra, Thane vs ACIT, Circle 1, ThaneITA 5853/MUM/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Sip Infotech Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 5355/MUM/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
- Rajiv Kumar, Delhi vs DCIT, Circle 67(1), DelhiITA 3538/DEL/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- DCIT 19 1 Mumbai, Mumbai vs Nisha Jhaveri, MumbaiITA 2389/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Arokiaswamy Velumani, Bengaluru vs Income Tax Officer 15(3)(1), MumbaiITA 1946/MUM/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026