AMEYA PERFOMATT FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED,VADODARA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA
What were the facts?
The assessee, a newly incorporated company, acquired shares from an associate concern at a price higher than the face value. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 40A(2)(a) to add the excess payment as expenditure, treating it as unreasonable.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 40A(2)(a) applies only to expenditure claimed in computing business income. Since the share acquisition was treated as a capital investment and not routed through the Profit and Loss account, the section was not applicable. The AO also failed to establish the fair market value of the shares.
What were the issues?
Whether Section 40A(2)(a) can be invoked for the acquisition of capital assets not claimed as expenditure in the Profit and Loss account. Whether the Assessing Officer correctly determined the fair market value of the shares.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
PER MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
-
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 03.09.2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. CIT (A)’ in short), under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ in short) for Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- “1. The Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi has erred in law and in facts in confirming the action of the Ld. A.O. in making an addition /disallowance applying t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40A(2)(a)
- Jeswani Liquors, Nagpur vs ACIT Circle -4, NagpurITA 548/NAG/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- DCIT-12(2)(2), Mumbai vs M/S.Guruashish Construction Private…ITA 2512/MUM/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed10 Aug 2026AY 2012-13
- Society for Human Transformation and… vs ITO Ward 2(2) Exemptions, Delhi, New DelhiITA 6718/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Vcommission Media Private Limited, New Delhi vs ACIT, Circle 26(1), New DelhiITA 4071/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: Disposed20 Mar 2026AY 2015-16
- Biramane Education Foundation, Satara… vs The ITO, Exemption Ward 1(1), Pune…ITA 2945/PUN/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed28 Jan 2026AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026