SHREE PURUSHOTAM EDUCATION TRUST,RAJKOT vs. ITO EXEMPTION WD 1,RAJKOT, RAJKOT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 728/RJT/2026Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot12 June 2026AY 2027-284 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(Exemption)'s order. The assessee was granted another opportunity to present their case before the CIT(Exemption).

What were the facts?

The assessee trust applied for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application due to non-compliance with requests for details regarding the genuineness of the trust's activities.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) erred in rejecting the registration application without affording adequate opportunity, and if the assessee should be granted another chance to comply.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT

Before: SHRI T. R. SENTHIL KUMAR & SHRI NARENDRA PRSAD SINHA

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Singhal, Ld. A.R
For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT-DR
Hearing: 20/05/2026Pronounced: 12/06/2026

PER T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the order dated 09.03.2026 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad (in short “Ld. CIT(E)”) denying registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had filed an application for registration of the Trust u/s. 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Act. The Ld. CIT(E) had called for certain details to examine the genuineness of the activities of the trust and to satisfy himself that the activities were in

- 2 - ITA No.728/Rjt/2026 Shree Purushotam Education Trust

consonance with the objects of the trust. As no compliance was made by the assessee, the Ld. CIT(E) had rejected the application of the assessee vide the impugned order dated 09.03.2026 and the provisional registration granted earlier was also cancelled.

3.

Aggrieved with the rejection order, the assessee is in appeal before us raising the following Grounds of Appeal:-

“1. I, AMIT GOVINDBHAI KORAT, Trustee of SHREE PURUSHOTAM EDUCATION TRUST, hereby state the grounds of appeal as under, without prejudice to one another

2.

The Ld. CIT Exemp. has erred on facts as also in law in rejecting application for renewal of regular registration u/s. 12A of the Act i. As sufficient documents, to held objects of the trust and its activities as charitable, have been furnished along with the application made for renewal of regular registration u/s. 12A, ii. As the trust was accorded regular registration earlier, considering objects and activities of the trust as charitable. There is no change in facts thereafter. iii. Without affording adequate opportunity of hearing, even the request for adjournment has not been considered. iv. Without issuing show cause notice, before

3.

The Appellant prays that the order of the Ld. CIT (Exemp.) may kindly be set aside and renewal of regular registration u/s. 12A of the Act kindly be accorded.

4.

Your Honours appellant craves leave to add, to amend, alter, vary and/OR withdraw any one OR more grounds of appeal on/OR before hearing of appeal.”

4.

Shri Rajendra Singhal, the Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) had allowed only one opportunity on 24.02.2026. The notice was sent on the e-mail but the trustees of the assessee trust were not regular in accessing the e-mail account. Further, they were not conversant with the procedural requirement for filing details online, and as a result no compliance could be made before the Ld. CIT(E). The Ld. AR requested that the assessee may be allowed another opportunity of being heard by setting aside the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(E).

- 3 - ITA No.728/Rjt/2026 Shree Purushotam Education Trust

5.

Per contra, Shri Sanjay Punglia, the Ld. CIT-DR, had no objection if the matter was set aside to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for allowing another opportunity to the assessee.

6.

We have considered the request of the assessee. The present application was filed for registration of the trust u/s 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Act. The Ld. CIT(E) had allowed only one opportunity to the assessee for furnishing certain details and thereafter the application of the assessee was rejected. The interest of natural justice cannot be served by rejecting the application by allowing only one opportunity. Therefore, in the interest Principle of Natural Justice, we, therefore, deem it proper to set aside the matter to the file of Ld. CIT(E) with direction to allow another opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to make compliance before the Ld. CIT(E) and produce the documents and evidences as required by the Trust.

7.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the Court on 12.06.2026 at Ahmedabad

Sd/- Sd/- (NARENDRA P. SINHA) (T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad, dated 12/06/2026 ak आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु त ( अपील ) / The CIT(A)-

- 4 - ITA No.728/Rjt/2026 Shree Purushotam Education Trust

5.

�वभागीय ��त�न�ध , आयकर अपील(य अ�धकरण , राजोकट/DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad, 6. गाड. फाईल /Guard file आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, उप/सहायक पंजीकारDy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, राजोकट / ITAT, Rajkot

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →