VISHNNU KUMAR SHARMA,CHURU RAJASTHAN vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) , JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO's order under section 148A(d) was passed without considering the assessee's reply and relied on incorrect information, rendering it without jurisdiction. The Tribunal also found the CIT(A)'s subsequent recharacterization of the income as contradictory and made without proper notice.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings based on information of cash deposits in the assessee's bank account. The assessee contended that the deposit amount was only Rs 2,00,000 and provided bank statements. The AO, despite accepting the lower amount, treated it as unexplained income.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated considering the AO's failure to consider the assessee's reply and reliance on incorrect information. Whether the CIT(A) erred in recharacterizing the income without proper notice after accepting the explanation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 246,Section 246A,Section 151,Section 251(2),Section 271AAC(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Prakash
PER : PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as “the CIT(A)”] dated 24.12.2025 arising out of the assessment order dated 23.04.2025 passed by the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as "the AO") under section 147 read with section 144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for the assessment year 2019-20. I.T.A No. 489/JPR/2026 Page No 2 Vishnu Kumar Sharma
The grounds of appeal raised by the Assessee before us in the memorandum of appeal in Form No.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026