AAGMODDHARAK SANSTHA,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(E)'s order. The assessee was granted another opportunity to present their case before the CIT(E).
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under section 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application due to non-compliance with requests for details, cancelling the provisional registration.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration application without granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing, and whether the cancellation of provisional registration was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI T. R. SENTHIL KUMAR & SHRI NARENDRA PRSAD SINHA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT (Conducted through E-Court at Ahmedabad) BEFORE SHRI T. R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI NARENDRA PRSAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.611/SRT/2026 (Assessment Year: N.A.) Vs. Commissioner of Income Aagmoddharak Sanstha, Tax (Exemption), Agammandir Road, Gopipura, Surat-395002 Ward, Surat [PAN No.AAATA3510F] (Appellant) (Respondent) .. Appellant by : Shri Sapnesh Sheth, Advocate Respondent by : Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 20/05/2026 Date of Pronouncement 12/06/2026 O R D E R PER T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the order dated 07.03.2026 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad (in short “Ld. CIT(E)”) denying registration under section 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had filed an application for registration of the Trust u/s. 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Act. The Ld. CIT(E) had called for certain details on 01.12.2025 to examine the genuineness of the activities of the trust and to satisfy himself that the activities were in consonance with the objects of the trust. As no compliance was made by the assessee, the Ld. CIT(E) had rejected the
- 2 - ITA No.611/Srt/2026 A.Y. N.A. application of the assessee vide the impugned order dated 07.03.2026 and the provisional registration granted earlier was also cancelled.
Aggrieved with the rejection order, the assessee is in appeal before us raising the following Grounds of Appeal:
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has erred in rejecting the application made by the assessee trust without granting reasonable opportunity of hearing. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has erred in not granting permanent registration to the assessee trust by rejecting the application filed in Form 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the I.T. Act 1961 & further erred in cancelling the provisional registration granted to assessee. 3. It is therefore prayed that order of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) rejecting application of assessee may please be quashed. 4. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.” 4. Shri Sapnesh Sheth, the Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) had allowed only one opportunity on 01.12.2025. The notice was sent on the e-mail but the trustees of the assessee trust were not regular in accessing the e-mail account. Further, they were not conversant with the procedural requirement for filing details online, and as a result no compliance could be made before the Ld. CIT(E). The Ld. AR requested that the assessee may be allowed another opportunity of being heard by setting aside the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(E).
Per contra, Shri Mukesh Jain, the Ld. CIT-DR, had no objection if the matter was set aside to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for allowing another opportunity to the assessee.
- 3 - ITA No.611/Srt/2026 A.Y. N.A. 6. We have considered the request of the assessee. The present application was filed for registration of the trust u/s 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Act. The Ld. CIT(E) had allowed only one opportunity to the assessee for furnishing certain details and thereafter the application of the assessee was rejected. The interest of natural justice cannot be served by rejecting the application by allowing only one opportunity. Therefore, in the interest Principle of Natural Justice, we, therefore, deem it proper to set aside the matter to the file of Ld. CIT(E) with direction to allow another opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to make compliance before the Ld. CIT(E) and produce the documents and evidences as required by the Trust.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced under proviso of Rule 34(4) of ITAT Rules, 1963 on 12.06.2026 Sd/- Sd/- (NARENDRA P. SINHA) (T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad, dated 12/06/2026 Tanmay, Sr. PS TRUE COPY आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��थ� / The Respondent संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 3. 4. आयकर आयु� अपील / The CIT(A)- ( ) 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण राजोकट/DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad, , , 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, राजोकट / ITAT, Surat
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026