SHRI KABIRPANTHI GADI ,GUJARAT vs. INCOME TAX WARD-2 EXEPMTION, GUJARAT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1535/AHD/2026Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 August 2026AY 2019-204 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, considering the technical nature of the disallowance and the circumstances of ignorance and death of the accountant. The matter was restored to the AO for adjudication on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a charitable trust, filed its return belatedly due to the old age and health issues of its trustees and accountant. The claim for exemption was disallowed solely because Form 9A was furnished late, despite being filed with the return. The appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to a significant delay in filing, which was not condoned.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing Form 9A and the subsequent appeal should be condoned given the circumstances, and whether the appeal should be decided on merits despite the technical delay.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 11(1),Section 139(4),Section 143(1),Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH

Before: DR. BRR Kumar & Shri Tapas Ram Misra

For Respondent: Shri Amit Pratap Singh, Sr. D.R

THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH Before DR. BRR Kumar, Vice President And Shri Tapas Ram Misra, Judicial Member ITA No. 1535/Ahd/2026 Assessment Year 2019-20

Shri Kabirpanthi Gadi Income Tax Officer Ward-2 Exemption Gheekanta Road Vs Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, Gujarat Ahmedabad-380001, Gujarat PAN: AAUTS0745E (Respondent) (Appellant) Assessee by: None Revenue by: Shri Amit Pratap Singh, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing : 25-08-2026 Date of pronouncement : 31-08-2026 आदेश/ORDER PER TAPAS RAM MISRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Addl/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Pune, (hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”), dated 27.03.2026 passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and relates to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2019-20.

2.

The assessee’s appeal was filed belatedly before the NFAC. The delay was of nearly five years as the intimation u/s. 143(1), which was under challenge, was passed on 26/08/2020 and the appeal was filed on 14/11/2025. The assessee had sought condonation of delay before the NFAC and filed an affidavit stating that the circumstances that led to the delay.

3.

In the statement of facts filed before the NFAC, the assessee, a Charitable Trust, stated that the return for Asst. year 2019-20 was filed belatedly u/s. 139(4) on 23/06/2020 because the Trustee of the assessee Trust were very old and so was the Accountant who was also affected by Corona Virus and therefore unable to complete the audit of the trust in time. The assessee field its return of income and Form 9A on 23/06/2020, the intimation u/s. 143(1) was issued on 26/08/2020 disallowing the claim for exemption on account of deemed application of income for charitable purposes as per clause (2) of Explanation 1 to Section 11(1). The amount of disallowance was Rs.2,01,00,000/- and the only reason for the disallowance was that the Form No. 9A was furnished late.

4.

In appeal, the Ld. ADDL/JCIT- (Appeals)-2, Pune discussed the issue of condonation of delay quite elaborately and held that the delay of 1876 days in filing of appeal was not condoned, as no sufficient cause was shown by the assessee. Since the delay was not condoned, the Ld. CIT(A) did not deal with the merits of the appeal and treated the appeal as dismissed in limine.

5.

The assessee has preferred the present appeal against this order on the following two grounds: 1. The Learned CIT(A) has erred in not decide the appeal on merits, since the disallowance is only on technical reasons for not filing the Form No. 9A within time limit as provided u/s. 139(1), it is 2 procedural delay and for that legitimate claim should not be denied. 2. The Learned CIT(A) has erred in dismiss our appeal on the ground of Delay in filing of appeal by not condoning the delay. He also erred in not appreciating the facts that the Trustee is aged and illiterate also corona period was there and hence the delay is happened.

6.

At the time of hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. There is an application dated 24/08/2026 seeking adjournment on the ground that the Counsel engaged by the assessee was having high fever and unable to appear. The affidavit filed by the assessee seeking condonation of delay has been reproduced in the impugned order. The Trustee of the assessee has claimed to be an old and uneducated person who was dependent on the Accountant for the preparation of accounts, audit and filing of return. The said accountant was also an elderly person having health issues at the relevant time, which resulted in delay in finalization of accounts and filing of return. Subsequently, the said accountant died out of ill-health and as a result of his death, the Trustees had no information about intimation u/s. 143(1) and the need for filing an appeal. It was much later that the assessee contacted another advisor and based on his advice filed the appeal.

7.

When seen in the context of the claim and its disallowance in the intimation u/s. 143(1), we notice that the assessee’s claim has been denied for a technical breach of filing Form 9A after the due date of filing of return. The said Form, however was filed along with the return and was available with the CPC on the date of the intimation u/s. 143(1) of the Act.

8.

In this view of the matter, we are inclined to accept the assessee’s plea for condonation of delay on the ground that the claim for exemption has been disallowed in the entirety and the assessee was prevented from filing an appeal largely due to ignorance of the fact that the disallowance have been made, and the death of its regular Accountant. We are therefore inclined to restore the matter to the file of JAO for adjudication on merits of the claim in accordance with law and available judicial precedents.

9.

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purpose.

This Order is pronounced on 31/08/2026

Sd/- Sd/- (DR. BRR KUMAR) (TAPAS RAM MISRA) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad : True Copy Dated 31/08/2026 Rajesh आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/आदेश से,

उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद 4

More judgments on Section 11(1)

All 245 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →