JAISWAL RICE MILL,LAKHIMPUR KHERI vs. ITO-3(4), LAKHIMPUR, LAKHIMPUR KHERI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found no material to support the diversion of interest-bearing funds for the loan and no rational basis for the 12% interest rate used. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against an ex-parte assessment order and CIT(A) order for AY 2020-21 was heard. The addition of Rs. 6,00,000 was made on account of 'deemed interest' on an interest-free loan given to an individual.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of deemed interest on an interest-free loan was justified, and if the assessment proceedings were conducted with proper opportunity and jurisdiction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘SMC’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M.
(A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi vide order dated 20.01.2026 for the AY 2020-21. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. That the Id. CIT (A), NFAC erred on facts and in law in passing the appeal order ex-parte without granting the proper opportunity of being heard to appellant and accordingly the appeal order is liable to be set aside.
That the Id. CIT (A), NFAC erred on facts and in law in sustaining the assessment order without appreciating the fact that appellants submission were not considered during the assessment proceedings and assessment order was passe
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026