DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. PRONOMZ VENTURES LLP, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the interest expenditure was incurred for the purposes of the assessee's business. It was also noted that sufficient interest-free funds were available to cover the investments, supporting the allowability of the interest.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer disallowed interest expenditure claimed by the assessee, arguing that borrowed funds were not used for business purposes but were advanced as interest-free loans or invested in shares. The CIT(A) allowed the assessee's appeal, leading to the present appeal by the revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether interest expenditure on borrowed funds used for investments in group companies and for advancing loans is allowable as a business expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal has been filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle– 2(3), Bangalore (“the learned Assessing Officer”), against the appellate order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–15, Bangalore (“the learned CIT(A)”) for Assessment Year 2020–21. In that order, the learned CIT(A) allowe
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(iii)
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shah Brothers, West Singhbhum vs ACIT/DCIT, Cen Cir-1, RanchiITA 239/RAN/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026