GANGOTRI VIHAR SEHKARI AWAS SAMITI,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and restored the matter to the AO. The assessee was granted one more opportunity to present its case with supporting evidence, with a caution to comply with the AO's directions.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society engaged in property transactions, filed a return declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the case, estimated income at 8% on total sales, and made an addition. The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO provided adequate opportunity to the assessee and whether the assessment order was based on sufficient material. The issue also concerns the ex-parte dismissal of the appeal by the NFAC.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 144,Section 271(1)(c),Section 271(1)(b),Section 271B,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 27.03.2024, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for Assessment Year 2016-17. 2.0 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act and was engaged in the business of purchase and sale of immovable properties. The assessee filed its return of income for the year under consideration on 31.03.2018 declaring total sales of Rs.5,03,12,000/- being the aggregate value of registeries executed during the year and declaring a loss of Rs.2,82,429/-.
The Income Tax Department was in possession of information that the assessee had made sale/purchase of immovable property valuing at Rs.1,32,07,000./- during the year under ITA No.42/LKW/2026 consideration.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026