ANURADHA CHENNU,TIRUPATI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), TIRUPATI

ITA 1987/HYD/2025Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2026AY 2013-1440 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The assessee did not file a return of income for AY 2013-14. Following a survey, it was found the assessee entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) for land contribution, entitling them to 50 flats. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the transfer of land as complete on JDA execution and computed long-term capital gains.

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 54F for all 50 flats receivable under the JDA, as the pre-amended provisions allowed for multiple residential units. The JDA itself constitutes documentary evidence for entitlement.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 54F for multiple residential units received under a JDA prior to the Finance Act, 2014 amendment, and whether the faceless assessment proceedings were validly initiated.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 139,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 2(47)(v),Section 53A,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 54F,Section 151A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad

Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

Hearing: 23/04/2026

Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:

This appeal is filed by Smt. Anuradha Chennu (“the assessee”), feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (“Ld. CIT(A)”) dated 22.09.2025 for the A.Y.2013-14. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

3.

The assessee has raised the following additional grounds of appeal:

“1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned NFAC, Delhi erred in assuming juri iction under section 151A r.w.s 144B of

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 139

All 3,561 judgments and leading authorities on Section 139 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →