M/S. LOTUS INFRA SOLUTIONS,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 6(4), MUMBIA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1499/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 April 2026AY 2021-223 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored all appeals to the file of the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on merits. The CIT(A) was directed to provide a fair opportunity to the assessee to present their case and the assessee was directed to furnish all required details and evidence.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals were dismissed ex-parte by the CIT(A) without considering the merits of the case. The assessee claimed they were unable to file submissions in time due to pending appeals and expressed a strong desire to pursue the appeals on merit.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeals ex-parte without considering the merits, and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 254(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No. 1498/MUM/2026
ITA No. 1500/MUM/2026

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER BENCH:

1.

This group of four appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate

orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-54 Mumbai [for short

“CIT(A)”] all dated 15.12.2015 for assessment year (AY) 2019-20 to 2022-23. In

all the appeals the ld CIT(A), confirmed the action of assessing officer (AO) in

ex-parte, order which is impugned before us.

2.

Rival submissions of both the parties have been heard and record perused. The

ld. Authorised Representative (AR) of the assessee submits that ld CIT(A)

Lotus Infra Solutions (AY 2019-20 to 2022-23) ITA No. 1497 to 1500/M/2026 dismissed all appeals in ex-parte order. The assessment was completed in

pursuance of survey action carried out on the assessee. More than 19 appeals

were pending before the CIT(A). The assessee could not file submissions in time.

Though, the assessee is really interested in pursuing all the appeals on merit.

The assessee has good case on merit and is likely to succeed if one more

opportunity is allowed to the assessee to contest all the appeals before CIT(A).

The learned AR of the assessee submits that he undertakes on behalf of

assessee to be more vigilant in future in making timely compliance. The ld CIT(A)

may be directed to decide on the appeals on merit.

3.

On the other hand, ld. Sr. DR for revenue submits that he has no objection if the

matter is restored back to the file of CIT(A) for consideration of application

afresh in accordance with law. But the assessee should make compliance to

substantiate various grounds of appeal.

4.

We have considered the rival submissions of both the parties and have gone

through the orders of lower authorities carefully. On considering the submissions

of ld AR of the assessee we find that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed all the appeal

without going through merits of the case. Considering the undertaking of ld. AR

of the assessee that assessee is really interested in pursuing their appeal on

merit. Thus, keeping in view the principle of natural justice, all the appeals are

restored back to the file of ld. CIT(A) with the direction to pass the order afresh

and in accordance with law. Needless to direct that before passing the order, the

ld. CIT(A) shall allow fair and reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The

Lotus Infra Solutions (AY 2019-20 to 2022-23) ITA No. 1497 to 1500/M/2026

assessee is also directed to furnish all require details and evidence, is so desired

by ld. CIT(A). In the result, all the appeals of assessee for all assessment years

before us are allowed for statistical purposes.

5.

In result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order was pronounced in the open Court on 30/04/2026 at the time of

hearing.

Sd Sd/-/- S Sd/- Sd/- /- GIRISH AGRAWAL PAWAN SINGH ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dated: 30/04/2026

Biswajit, Sr. PS

Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. By Order

Assistant Registrar / DDO ITAT, Mumbai

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →