ROTARY BENGALURU LAKE WORLD CHARITABLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and decided to remit the issue of granting 80G approval back to the CIT (Exemptions). The CIT is to decide the matter afresh, treating the application as filed under the correct clause.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for final approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The application was rejected by the CIT (Exemptions) because the trust inadvertently selected the wrong clause in Form 10AB.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of an 80G approval application due to a bonafide mistake in selecting the wrong clause in Form 10AB warrants a fresh consideration by the assessing officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT (Exemptions), Bengaluru dated 26.6.2025 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025-26/1077866496(1) rejecting the approval u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”).
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
ITA No.2232/Bang/2025 Rotary Bengaluru Lake World Charitable Trust, Bengaluru Page 2 of 7
At the outset, the ld. A.R. of the assessee submitted that there is a delay of 37 days in filing the appeal before this Tribunal. The ld. A.R. of the assessee also drew our attention on an application for the condonation of delay dated 7.10.2025 which is reproduced below for ease of reference and record:
ITA No.2232/Bang/2025 Rotary Bengaluru Lake World Charitable Trust, Bengaluru Page 3 of 7
ITA No.2232/Bang/2025 Rotary Bengaluru Lake World Charitable Trust, Bengaluru Page 4 of 7
The main reason cited for delay in filing the appeal was solely attributable to the unawareness of proper appellate remedy available upon rejection of the application u/s 80G of the Act. The assessee instead of filing an appeal before the Tribunal, under a genuine and mistaken belief, re-applied for registration by filing Form 10AB on 7.8.2025. It was only after obtaining professional advice, the assessee filed the present appeal with the delay of 37 days.
4.1 Perused the record and having heard learned counsel for the respective parties, it is perceived that the explanation offered in the condonation application is plausible and sufficient cause has been shown by the assessee, which prevented them from filing the appeal within the prescribed period and accordingly, we are inclined to condone the delay of 37 days in filing the appeal before this Tribunal.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust is registered u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act on 27.2.2023 vide Unique Registration No.(URN) : AAETR4547B22BL01 effective from AY 2022-23 to AY 2026-27. The assessee trust has also been granted approval under clause (i) of 1st Proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act on 16.2.2022 vide Unique Registration No. (URN): AAETR4547BF020219 effective from AY 2022-23 to AY 2026-27. The assessee trust thereafter applied for final approval u/s 80G of the Act on 2.12.2024. On receipt of the application in Form No.10AB dated 2.12.2024, the ld. CIT (Exemptions) verified the application and found that the trust was supposed to file the application for approval in Form No.10AB under clause (ii) of 1st proviso to sub- section (5) of section 80G of the Act since the assessee Trust has already obtained the provisional registration u/s 80G of the Act in Form No.10AC effective from 7.4.2022 to AY 2024-25. However, the assessee filed the application in Form No.10AB under clause (iii) of 1st proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act. Since the
ITA No.2232/Bang/2025 Rotary Bengaluru Lake World Charitable Trust, Bengaluru Page 5 of 7 assessee had selected the wrong section code while applying Form 10AB for registration u/s 80G of the Act, the application in form no.10AB dated 2.12.2024 was rejected.
Aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT (Exemptions) dated 26.6.2025, the assessee has filed the present appeal before this Tribunal. The assessee has also filed a paper book containing therein copy of form 12A final registration certificate, application for 80G provisional registration and application for 80G final registration.
Before us, the ld. A.R. of the assessee vehemently submitted that the assessee trust during the filing of the application for approval u/s 80G of the Act while selecting the drop-down box had inadvertently selected clause (iii) instead of clause (ii) of the 1st proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act. Further, the ld. A.R submitted that the ld. CIT (Exemptions) erred in rejecting the application without even providing an opportunity of being heard by way of issuing final show cause notice to the assessee, which is a gross violation of principles of natural justice and accordingly prayed that the ld. CIT (Exemptions) may be directed to treat the application filed in correct section code and consider the application accordingly as this was a bonafide mistake on the part of the assessee trust.
Ld. D.R. on the other hand supported the order of ld. CIT (Exemptions).
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. On going through the order of ld. CIT (Exemptions), we observed that the ld. CIT (Exemptions) rejected the Form No.10AB dated 2.12.2024 solely on the ground that assessee had selected the wrong section code while filing Form 10AB for approval u/s 80G of the Act. Undisputedly, the assessee had been
ITA No.2232/Bang/2025 Rotary Bengaluru Lake World Charitable Trust, Bengaluru Page 6 of 7 already granted approval on 16.2.2022 under clause (i) of 1st proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act vide URN: AAETR4547BF20219 effective from AY 2022-23 to AY 2026-27. Before us, the ld. A.R. of the assessee vehemently contended that while filing the form no.10AB, the assessee trust had inadvertently selected clause (iii) instead of clause (ii) of the proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act and submitted that it is a Bonafide mistake in selecting the wrong code. This being so, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play, we deem it fit and proper to remit the entire issue of granting approval u/s 80G of the Act to the file of ld. CIT (Exemptions) to decide afresh in accordance with law by treating the application in form no.10AB dated 2.12.2024 filed under the correct clause (ii) of proviso to section (5) of section 80G of the Act. Needless to say, a reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to submit all the relevant documents/records/accounts/certificates/reports in support of its claim or as directed by ld. CIT (Exemptions). It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29th May, 2026
Sd/- Sd/- (Prashant Maharishi) (Keshav Dubey) Vice President Judicial Member
Bangalore, Dated 29th May, 2026. VG/SPS
ITA No.2232/Bang/2025 Rotary Bengaluru Lake World Charitable Trust, Bengaluru Page 7 of 7
Copy to:
The Applicant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 5 Guard file By order
Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026