PUSAD URBAN ZP EMPLOYEES CO.OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,PUSAD vs. ITO, YAVATMAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the NFAC's order was passed ex parte without considering the merits of the case. Therefore, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes to enable a fresh hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed ex parte by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) without any observations on merits. The assessee claimed they were not served with any notices, and the NFAC's order did not specify the email address used for communication.
What were the issues?
Whether the NFAC's ex parte order was valid without proper service of notice and consideration of merits. Whether the assessee was provided with a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi, (for short, “CIT(A)”), dated 11/11/2025 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”), for the Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21. 2. On hearing both sides, we find that the impugned order has been passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, ex parte without any observations on merits. Ld. Counsel has submitted that the assessee was not served with any notices. We find that National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, in its order does not mention about the e–mail address on which notices were issued, though in Form
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026