LATE PURUSHOTTAM HARI (GANESH) PATIL EDUCATION SOCIETY,SHEGAON vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR-EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the adjustments made by the CPC might have resulted in dual deduction. The issues required verification of facts. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable educational society, filed its return declaring nil income and claiming exemption. The CPC made adjustments under section 143(1) by reducing the application of income based on amounts reported in Form 10B, which the assessee did not exclude. The first appellate authority sustained these adjustments.
What were the issues?
Whether adjustments made by CPC under section 143(1) for application of income were justified, and whether these adjustments led to dual deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ADDL/JCIT (Appeals)-3, Chennai (for short, “CIT(A)”), dated 30/07/2025 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”) which is emanating from order of intimation dated 18.11.2024 Patil Education Society) passed u/s. 143(1) of the Act for the Assessment Year (AY) 2023-24. 2. Heard and perused the record. Appellant is a charitable educational society registered u/s. 12A/12AB and is engaged in imparting education to students through schools and colleges. Return of income was filed declaring NIL income and claiming exemption u/s. 11 & 12 of the Act. CPC has, vide intimation u/s. 143(1), redu
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026