SANJAY NAYAK,BENGALURU vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the relief granted by the CIT(A) had been given effect to by the Assessing Officer, rendering the appeal infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order that was partly allowed by the CIT(A). Subsequently, the Assessing Officer passed an order giving effect to the CIT(A)'s order, resulting in relief for the assessee and a nil demand notice.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the assessee can be withdrawn when the relief granted by the lower appellate authority has been given effect to by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – PRESIDENT AND SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 2082/Bang/2025 Assessment Year : 2017-18
Sri Sanjay Nayak, Apt. N8, 27 Park Avenue, The Deputy Commissioner of 24th Main, HSR Sector 1, Income Tax, HSR Layout S.O., Central Circle – 2(1), Vs. Bengaluru – 560 102. Bengaluru. PAN: AAAPN0409J APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Sri Sumanth Sudarshan, Assessee by Advocate : Sri Jeetendra Kumar, CIT - DR Revenue by
Date of Hearing : 06-04-2026 Date of Pronouncement : 18-06-2026
ORDER PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – PRESIDENT 1. ITA No. 2082/Bangalore/2025 is filed by Mr. Sanjay Nayak (the Assessee/Appellant) against the Appellate Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 15, Bangalore (the Ld. CIT(A)) dated 28.07.2025 wherein the Appeal filed by the Assessee against the Assessment Order passed u/s. 143(3)r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act was partly allowed.
The Assessee has filed an application on 30.03.2026 that the Ld. Assessing Officer has passed the order giving effect to the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 28.07.2025 wherein the Assessee has got the relief from the Ld. Assessing
ITA No. 2082/Bang/2025 Page 2 of 2 Officer and the notice of demand u/s. 156 of the Act was issued also issued at nil. It was stated that the Tribunal may permit the assessee to withdraw the above Appeal.
The Ld. Authorized Representative also submitted the same, the Ld. CIT – DR Sri Jeetendra Kumar did not object.
In view of the above facts, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stand dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced he open court on 18th June, 2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (SOUNDARARAJAN K.) (PRASHANT MAHARISHI) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE-PRESIDENT Bangalore, Dated, the 18th June, 2026. *TNTS* Copy to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4.CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Bangalore By order
Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026