INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1),, GUNTUR vs. VIJAYA LAKSHMI RAVULA, GUNTUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the revision order under Section 263 was already set aside by a previous ITAT order, the reassessment order based on it had no legal standing. Therefore, the CIT(A)'s decision to annul the reassessment was upheld.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which annulled a reassessment made under Section 263. The CIT(A) had relied on a previous ITAT order that set aside the revision order. The Revenue argued that their appeal against the ITAT order was pending before the High Court.
What were the issues?
Whether a reassessment order based on a revision order that has been set aside by a higher tribunal is valid, especially when an appeal against the setting aside order is pending.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, िवशाखाप"नम पीठ, िवशाखाप"नम INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DB-BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANJUNATHA G. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA 297/VIZ/2026 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-2017 INCOME TAX OFFICER, VIJAYA LAKSHMI WARD 2(1), RAVULA, STANDARD HOUSE, H NO. 3-663/3, THIRD FLOOR, PRAGATHI ENCLAVE, NAGARAMPALEM,, UNDAVALLI (RURAL), Vs. GUNTUR-522004, UNDAVALLI (POST), ANDHRA PRADESH TADEPALLI (MD) GUNTUR-522501, ANDHRA PRADESH अपीलाथ" Appellant ""थ" Respondent C.O.No.08/VIZ./2026 Arising out of ITA 297/VIZ/2026 - िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-2017 VIJAYA LAKSHMI RAVULA, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), H NO. 3-663/3, PRAGATHI ENCLAVE, STANDARD HOUSE, UNDAVALLI (RURAL), THIRD FLOOR, UNDAVALLI (POST), NAGARAMPALEM,, TADEPALLI (MD) GUNTUR-522004, GUNTUR-522501, ANDHRA PRADESH ANDHRA PRADESH Cross Objector Respondent PAN of Assessee/Cross BAOPR0163G Objector:
ITA 297/VIZ/2026 And C.O.08/VIZ./2026 VIJAYA LAKSHMI RAVULA
अपीलाथ" "ारा/Appellant represented by: CA C Subrahmanyam ""थ" "ारा/Respondent represented by: Sri A.P. Babu, Sr. AR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of hearing: 23.07.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026