THE MAHANAGAR CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-1(1) CUTTACK, CUTTACK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment order was passed without jurisdiction as it predated the notification authorizing NFAC to pass such orders. Consequently, the assessment order and all consequent proceedings were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal with a delay. The core issue was whether the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) had the jurisdiction to pass an assessment order under Section 147 before a specific notification was issued. The assessment order was passed on September 17, 2021, while the notification granting NFAC such powers was dated March 29, 2022.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of an assessment order passed by NFAC under Section 147 before the relevant notification granting it jurisdiction was issued.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
PerBench: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC),Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2012- 13/10063702dated03.02.2026for the assessment year 2013-13. 2. Shri K. K. Bal, AR appeared on behalf of the assessee and Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. DR represented on behalf of the revenue.
The appeal is filed by the assessee with a delay of 9 days. The assessee has filed a condonation petition which is further supported by an affidavit for condonation of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026