SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA,AGRA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), FIROZABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 109/AGR/2026Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 April 2026AY 2012-134 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's non-compliance but, considering the peculiar facts and the assessee's humble background, decided to grant one more opportunity. The case was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to comply with notices from the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A), leading to ex-parte orders. The assessee claimed illness and lack of understanding as reasons for non-compliance.

What were the issues?

Whether the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated and whether the addition under Section 68 was justified, considering the assessee's non-compliance and claims of illness.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144,Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH (SMC

Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN

For Respondent: DR (Physical hearing)
Hearing: 21.04.2026Pronounced: 21.04.2026

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH (SMC), AGRA BEFORE : SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 109/Agr/2026 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Santosh Kumar Sharma Vs. DCIT, Kachora Raod, Jaitpur Kala, Circile-2(2)(1), Agra-282001. Firozabad. PAN : BQHPS8198H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Sahib P. Satsangi, C.A. Department by Sh. Harsh Siddharth Gautam, Sr. DR (Physical hearing) Date of hearing 21.04.2026 Date of pronouncement 21.04.2026 ORDER PER : S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The assessee has filed this appeal against the order of the Ld. Addl./JCIT(A) Bhubaneswar dated 09.12.2025 for the Assessment Year 2012-13, wherein the assessee has raised following grounds:-

"1. Because under the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 by the Assessing Officer (AO). 2. Because the reopening of assessment was bad in law as it was based on vague information from AIR data without any independent application of mind by the learned AO to establish that income had actually escaped assessment.

ITA No.109/Agr/2026

3.

Because the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming an ex-parte 3 assessment order passed under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. Because the learned authorities below failed to appreciate that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause (severe illness supported by medical evidence) from appearing during the assessment/appellate proceedings. Dismissing the appeal without a merit-based review of the appellants circumstances is a violation of the principles of natural justice. 5. Because under the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 12,70,000/- as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 6. Because the learned authorities below failed to consider the primary evidence submitted (land sale deeds) including cash withdrawn from bank during the year by the appellant and his 6 father towards explanation of the source of the cash deposits. The rejection of these deeds solely on the ground of date mismatch is arbitrary and ignores the ground reality of rural land transactions including receipt of consideration in cash. 7. Because the learned authorities below erred in law by invoking Section 68. It is a settled legal position that a Savings Bank Passbook does not constitute books of account maintained by the assessee. Therefore, no addition can be legally sustained under Section 68 based solely on bank entries WHARE no formal books of account are maintained by a small farmer. 8. Because the learned CTT(A) erred in confirming the addition without directing the learned AO to conduct an independent inquiry especially when the appellant had provided the identity and source of the funds. 9. That the appellant crave leave to add, amend, alter, or withdraw any of the grounds of appeal at or before the time of the hearing.” 2. At the time of hearing, Id. AR of the assessee brought to my notice that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 144/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "Act") was passed ex-parte for the reasons that assessee had not made any compliance for the various statutory notices issued by him. Accordingly, assessment was completed

2 | P a g e

ITA No.109/Agr/2026

u/s 144 of the Act. Further, he submitted that aggrieved with the above order, the assessee preferred an appeal before NFAC. However, even before Ld. CIT (Appeals) the assessee has not complied to various notices issued for hearing, neither filed any reply. Further he submitted that assessee being uneducated and hailing from humble background necessary action was not taken and also failed to follow up the same from his counsel. Accordingly, he prayed that the appeal may be remitted back to the Assessing Officer to re-do the assessment with proper facts available on record.

3.

On the other hand, Ld. DR accepted the fact that there is no compliance from the assessee and he has no objection to remit the issue back to the file of Assessing Officer.

4.

Considered the rival submissions and the material placed on record. I observed that the assessment order was passed due to non compliance on the part of the assessee as well as before first appellate authority accordingly, Ld. CIT(Appeals) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee for non compliance. Considering the peculiar fact on record, in my considered view the assessee may be given one more opportunity of being heard. Therefore I am inclined to remit this issue back to the file of

3 | P a g e

ITA No.109/Agr/2026

Assessing Officer to re do assessment as per law after giving proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 21.04.2026. Sd/- (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 24.04.2026 *Santosh, Sr. PS Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Agra

4 | P a g e

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →