BABA BUDHA JI FOUNDATION TRUST,CHANDIGARH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the rejection was based on a technical, inadvertent error. It set aside the orders and directed the CIT(E) to grant an opportunity of hearing and allow correction of the applications before disposing them on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iv) and consequential registration under Section 80G(5)(iii). The application for Section 12A registration was rejected as it was filed under the wrong clause, leading to the rejection of the 80G application.
What were the issues?
Whether rejection of registration applications solely on the ground of filing under a wrong clause, without granting an opportunity to correct the error, is justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A(1)(ac)(iv),Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii),Section 80G(5)(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: HON’BLE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Bench
Aggrieved by rejection of an application as filed by the assessee seeking registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iv) and consequential rejection of application seeking registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) vide impugned orders dated 28-02-2026 of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh, [CIT(E)], the assessee is in further appeals before us. Upon perusal of para of rejection order u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iv), it could be 2
seen that the whole basis of rejection is the fact
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iv)
- Shreyans Charitable Foundation, Ahmedabad vs PCIT (Central), AhmedabadITA 2287/AHD/2026[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Cyberverse Foundation, Mysuru vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)…ITA 1769/BANG/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2026AY 2025-26
- Cyberverse Foundation, Mysuru vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)…ITA 1768/BANG/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2026AY 2025-26
- Baba Budha Ji Foundation Trust, Chandigarh vs CIT Exemptions, ChandigarhITA 555/CHANDI/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed2 Jun 2026AY 2026-27
- S.S. Jain Sabha Golf Link, Ludhiana vs CIT Exemptions, JalandharITA 482/ASR/2024[24-25]Status: Disposed20 Mar 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026