GUR AASRA TRUST,MOHALI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) did not properly examine the dominant objects and actual activities of the trust, especially considering its long history of being recognized as a charitable institution. The conflicting orders on the same date indicated a lack of proper application of mind.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Gur Aasra Trust, engaged in charitable activities for orphan children and destitute women, applied for registration under Section 12AB. Initially granted registration as a 'Charitable' trust, a subsequent order characterized it as 'religious-cum-charitable,' leading to denial of Section 80G approval.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee trust qualifies as a purely charitable institution for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G, or if its activities also have a religious component.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, ‘A’ CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI LALIET KUMAR & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण,च�डीगढ़ �यायपीठ, च�डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, ‘A’ CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 337 & 338/CHD/2026 �नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year: 2026-27 Gur Aasra Trust, The CIT (Exemptions), C/o Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate Vs Chandigarh. # 527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh. �थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATG2754M अपीलाथ�/Appellant ��यथ�/Respondent Assessee by : Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 27.05.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 02.06.2026
PHYSICAL HEARING O R D E R PER LALIET KUMAR, JM
These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as "the CIT(E)"] dated 04.02.2026 and 05.02.2026 pertaining to Assessment Year 2026-27 whereby the assessee was treated as a religious-cum-charitable trust for the purposes of registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and,
ITA No.337 & 338/CHD/2026 A.Y.2026-27 2
consequentially, approval under section 80G of the Act was
denied.
Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee,
namely Gur Aasra Trust, is a trust engaged in activities relating
to the welfare of orphan children, destitute women, widows and
elderly persons. The trust has been in existence for more than
two decades and has been carrying out charitable activities from
its premises situated at Mohali. The assessee was originally
granted registration under section 12A of the Act with effect from
16.03.2000. Subsequently, registration under section 12A as
well as approval under section 80G were granted on 24.09.2021.
There is no dispute that the assessee has continuously enjoyed
registration under the provisions of the Act and there has been
no adverse finding recorded by the Revenue authorities
regarding the genuineness of its activities.
During the year under consideration, the assessee filed an
application seeking registration under section 12AB of the Act.
The Ld. CIT(E), after examining the application and material
available on record, issued Form No.10AD dated 04.02.2026
granting registration under section 12AB(1)(b) of the Act. In the
ITA No.337 & 338/CHD/2026 A.Y.2026-27 3
said registration order, the nature of activities of the assessee
was specifically mentioned as "Charitable" and registration was
granted for the assessment years 2027-28 to 2036-37. The
registration order further recorded that after considering the
application and the material available on record, the applicant
was found entitled to registration under section 12AB of the Act.
The said order forms part of the record before us. The
registration certificate specifically records the nature of
activities as "Charitable".
However, on the very same date, another communication
came to be issued by the Ld. CIT(E) whereby the earlier order
was sought to be rectified and the assessee was treated as a
religious-cum-charitable trust. Consequent to such
characterization, the assessee was also denied approval under
section 80G of the Act. Aggrieved by the aforesaid action of the
Ld. CIT(E), the assessee preferred the present appeals before the
Tribunal.
Before us, the Ld. Authorised Representative submitted
that the impugned orders are contrary to the material available
on record and suffer from complete non-application of mind. It
ITA No.337 & 338/CHD/2026 A.Y.2026-27 4
was submitted that the assessee has been carrying out
charitable activities for more than twenty-five years and has
consistently been recognized by the Department as a charitable
institution. Our attention was drawn to the registration granted
under section 12A with effect from 16.03.2000 and the
subsequent registration and approval under sections 12A and
80G granted on 24.09.2021. It was argued that there has been
no change whatsoever in the aims and objects of the trust and
the same objects have been examined repeatedly by the
Department while granting registrations from time to time.
The Ld. AR further submitted that the dominant objects of
the trust are to provide shelter, food, medical assistance,
education and rehabilitation to orphan children, widows,
destitute women and elderly persons. It was contended that the
trust caters to all sections of society without discrimination on
the basis of religion, caste or creed. It was pointed out that even
the land on which the institution is functioning was allotted by
the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority for charitable
purposes. It was argued that the activities carried out by the
trust are wholly charitable and there is not even a single activity
ITA No.337 & 338/CHD/2026 A.Y.2026-27 5
undertaken for the advancement of any particular religion.
Referring to the financial statements placed on record, the
Ld. AR submitted that no expenditure has been incurred by the
assessee on any religious activity. It was contended that the sole
basis adopted by the Ld. CIT(E) appears to be one clause in the
trust deed which provides for organizing Gurbani Kirtan
Samagams for the spiritual upliftment of the masses and
conducting religious, social and charitable activities. According
to the Ld. AR, the mere presence of such a clause in the trust
deed cannot determine the character of the institution,
particularly when the actual activities carried out by the trust
are entirely charitable in nature. It was submitted that there is
neither any place of worship maintained by the trust nor any
denominational religious activity carried out by it.
The Ld. Departmental Representative, on the other hand,
relied upon the impugned orders passed by the Ld. CIT(E).
However, during the course of hearing, the Ld. DR fairly
submitted that if the Tribunal finds that the issue has not been
examined in its proper perspective, the matter may be restored
to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration after
ITA No.337 & 338/CHD/2026 A.Y.2026-27 6
examining the objects and activities of the trust.
We have heard the rival submissions and carefully perused
the material available on record. The undisputed factual position
emerging from the record is that the assessee-trust has been
enjoying registration under the provisions of the Act since the
year 2000. There is nothing brought on record by the Revenue
to demonstrate that the objects of the trust have undergone any
material change since the grant of the original registration.
Similarly, there is no finding recorded by any authority that the
activities carried out by the assessee are not genuine.
We further find that the very same Ld. CIT(E), after
considering the application filed under section 12AB and the
material available on record, granted registration to the assessee
vide Form No.10AD dated 04.02.2026. Significantly, in the said
order, the nature of activities was specifically recorded as
"Charitable". Thus, a conscious satisfaction stood recorded by
the competent authority that the assessee was carrying on
charitable activities and was entitled to registration under
section 12AB of the Act.
ITA No.337 & 338/CHD/2026 A.Y.2026-27 7
10.1 What is rather unusual is that on the very same date
another communication came to be issued whereby the assessee
was treated as a religious-cum-charitable trust. From the
material placed before us, we are unable to discern any fresh
material, any subsequent development, any enquiry report or
any objective basis which could justify such a departure from
the satisfaction already recorded by the authority while granting
registration. The impugned action appears to have been taken
primarily with reference to one clause contained in the trust
deed.
In our considered view, the character of a trust cannot be
determined merely by isolating one clause from the trust deed.
What is required to be examined is the predominant object of the
institution and the actual activities carried out by it. The objects
and activities placed before us clearly reveal that the trust is
engaged in providing care and support to orphan children,
widows, destitute women and elderly persons. The activities are
public-oriented and are not confined to followers of any
particular religion. The record further does not indicate that the
assessee has incurred expenditure towards religious activities or
ITA No.337 & 338/CHD/2026 A.Y.2026-27 8
that it is engaged in propagating any particular faith.
We also find merit in the contention of the assessee that
despite repeated registrations granted by the Department over
the years, no adverse material has been brought on record to
justify a change in the characterization of the institution.
Consistency is an important facet of tax administration and any
departure from an earlier accepted position must be supported
by cogent material and detailed reasoning. Such exercise is
conspicuously absent in the impugned orders.
At the same time, we are conscious of the fact that the
satisfaction contemplated under section 12AB is required to be
recorded by the prescribed authority after due examination of all
relevant facts and circumstances. Since the impugned order
does not reflect a detailed examination of the historical
registrations, actual activities, financial statements and the
dominant objects of the trust, we deem it appropriate, in the
interest of justice, to restore the matter to the file of the Ld.
CIT(E) for fresh adjudication.
The Ld. CIT(E) shall re-examine the matter afresh after
ITA No.337 & 338/CHD/2026 A.Y.2026-27 9
taking into consideration the historical registration granted to
the assessee since the year 2000, the registration and approval
granted on 24.09.2021, the registration order dated 04.02.2026
wherein the nature of activities was recorded as charitable, the
trust deed, the financial statements and all other evidences that
may be placed on record by the assessee. The Ld. CIT(E) shall
pass a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after
affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The
exercise shall preferably be completed within six months from
the date of receipt of this order.
In view of the foregoing discussion, the issue relating to
registration under section 12AB is restored to the file of the Ld.
CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. The grounds raised by the assessee
are allowed for statistical purposes.
15.1 Since the denial of approval under section 80G is
consequential to the characterization of the assessee as a
religious-cum-charitable institution and we have restored the
issue relating to registration under section 12AB to the file of
the Ld. CIT(E), the issue relating to approval under section 80G
is also restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh
ITA No.337 & 338/CHD/2026 A.Y.2026-27 10
consideration in accordance with law after adjudicating the
assessee's claim under section 12AB.
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed
for statistical purposes
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed
for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 02nd June,2026.
Sd/- Sd/-
(MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (LALIET KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER “Poonam” आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�/ CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 5. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File
सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026