AL RASHEED CHARITABLE SOCIETY,HARYANA vs. DCIT/ACIT(E)(C-2), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1268/CHANDI/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh02 June 2026AY 2026-274 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the subsequent grant of registration by the CIT(E) itself validates the assessee's eligibility and renders the earlier rejection order unsustainable. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to registration under Section 12AB.

What were the facts?

The assessee society applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, which was initially rejected by the CIT(E). However, during the pendency of the appeal, the CIT(E) granted registration to the assessee as a 'Religious Entity' for 'Religious cum charitable' activities.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of registration under Section 12AB was justified when the assessee was subsequently granted registration for religious-cum-charitable activities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “ए” , च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी लिलत कुमार, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल, लेखा सद" BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR, JM & SHRI. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 1268 /Chd/ 2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2026-27 Al Rasheed Charitable Society बनाम The DCIT / ACIT(E) (C-2) 91/2 Islamia School, Chachrauli Chandigarh Road, Jagadhri, Yamunanagar, Haryana-135003 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAA5927H अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Jai Shree Sharma, CIT DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 02/06/2026 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 02/06/2026

आदेश/Order PER LALIET KUMAR, J.M: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee society against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as 'the CIT(E)'] dt. 22/08/2025 whereby the application of the assessee seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was rejected.

2.

In the present appeal Assessee has raised the following grounds:

1.

That on the facts, circumstances and legal position of the case, the registration granted u/s 12AB(1)(b) by Worthy CIT(E) in the category "Religious Entity" instead of "Charitable Entity" is erroneous and said registration deserves to be granted as a Charitable entity.

2.

That on law, facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by Worthy CIT(E) deserves to be quashed since the same has been passed without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant.

3.

That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same.

3.

Briefly stated, the assessee society is registered under the Societies Registration Act and is engaged in carrying out activities which, according to the assessee, are religious as well as charitable in nature. The assessee filed an application seeking registration under section 12AB of the Act. During the course of proceedings before the Ld. CIT(E), various documents including the constitutional documents, details of objects and activities and other supporting evidences were furnished.

3.

1 The Ld. CIT(E), however, was not satisfied and rejected the application filed by the assessee. Aggrieved by the said action of the Ld. CIT(E), the assessee has preferred the present appeal before the Tribunal.

4.

Against the order of the Ld. CIT(E) the assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal.

5.

During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee society is genuinely engaged in religious-cum-charitable activities and all requisite details and documentary evidences were furnished before the Ld. CIT(E). It was contended that the rejection of registration was not justified in the facts and circumstances of the case.

5.

1 The Ld. AR further invited our attention to the subsequent development wherein the very same competent authority, namely the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh, has granted registration under section 12AB(1)(b) of the Act to the assessee society. It was submitted that while granting registration, the Department has specifically recorded the nature of activities of the assessee as "Religious cum charitable" and has granted registration as a "Religious Entity". It was further submitted that the subsequent grant of registration itself establishes the genuineness of the activities and the eligibility of the assessee for registration under section 12AB.

6.

Per contra, the Ld. DR relied upon the order of the Ld. CIT(E). However, he fairly did not dispute the fact that subsequently registration under section 12AB(1)(b) has been granted to the assessee society by the Department itself.

7.

We have heard the rival submissions and carefully perused the material available on record.

7.

1 We find that the controversy involved in the present appeal lies in a very narrow compass. The grievance of the assessee relates to denial of registration under section 12AB of the Act. However, during the pendency of the present proceedings, the competent authority has itself granted registration to the assessee society under section 12AB(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 7.2 The registration certificate placed on record reveals that the nature of activities of the assessee has been recorded as "Religious cum charitable". The registration has been granted under section 12AB(1)(b) and the annexure appended thereto specifically records that the registration is being granted as a "Religious Entity". The registration has been granted after considering the application and material available on record. Further, no adverse finding regarding the genuineness of activities of the assessee has been recorded while granting such registration.

7.

3 The subsequent action of the Department in granting registration under section 12AB(1)(b) goes to the root of the controversy and clearly demonstrates that the assessee fulfills the statutory requirements for grant of registration. Once the competent authority itself has accepted the nature of activities of the assessee as religious-cum-charitable and has granted registration under section 12AB, the very basis of the impugned rejection order no longer survives.

7.

4 We further note that the registration certificate categorically recognizes the assessee as a Religious Entity and records that its activities are religious-cum-charitable in nature. The Department having itself accepted the genuineness of the activities and eligibility of the assessee for registration, no useful purpose would be served by sustaining the impugned order.

7.

5 It is pertinent to observe that the assessee society has not applied for approval under section 80G of the Act. Therefore, no issue concerning grant

of approval under section 80G arises for adjudication before us. Since the assessee is engaged in religious-cum-charitable activities and seeks registration under section 12AB, the question regarding eligibility under section 80G is wholly irrelevant for the purposes of the present appeal.

7.

6 Considering the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, the subsequent grant of registration by the Department itself, and the recognition accorded to the assessee as a Religious Entity carrying on religious-cum- charitable activities, we are of the considered opinion that the assessee is entitled to registration under section 12AB of the Act.

7.

7 Accordingly, the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(E) is set aside.

The appeal of the assessee society is allowed and the Ld. CIT(E) is directed to issue and give effect to the registration under section 12AB in respect of the assessee society for carrying on religious-cum-charitable activities in accordance with law.

8.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed.

Order pronounced on 02/06/2026 मनोज कुमार अ"वाल लिलत कुमार (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (LALIET KUMAR) लेखा सद"/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "ाियक सद" /JUDICIAL MEMBER AG आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ"/ The Appellant

2.

""थ"/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु"/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु" (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च"ीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड" फाईल/ Guard File

आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →