JHANJRA PROJECT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,PASCHIM BARDDHAMAN vs. I.T.O., WARD - 2(1), DURGAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the significant delay in filing the first appeal, citing the COVID-19 situation and administrative issues as sufficient cause. The matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 626 days. The delay was attributed to the dissolution of the board, lack of elections, and the COVID-19 situation. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal due to this delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was sufficiently explained and should be condoned. The primary issue was the interpretation of 'sufficient cause' for condoning a substantial delay.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH,
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.407/KOL/2026 Assessment Year: 2020-21 Jhanjra Project Employees Vs. ITO, Ward-2(1), Durgapur Cooperative Credit Society Limited Jhanjra Project, P.O-Laudoha, Dist-Paschim Barddhaman, West Bengal-713385 [PAN: AABAJ7044B] APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : None Respondent by : Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR Date of hearing : 18.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 22.06.2026 O R D E R PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi (Appeal) [“the Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 21.01.2026 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the assessment year 2020-21.
Brief facts of the case are that, an Assessment Order came to be passed u/s 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 16.09.2022 by making certain additions. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated
ITA No.407/Kol/2026 Jhanjra Project Employees Cooperative Credit Society Limited; A.Y: 2020-21 16.09.2022, Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 21.01.2026, dismissed the Appeal filed by the Assessee on delay in latches as there was delay of 626 days in filing the first Appeal.
None appeared for the Assessee. Considering the issue involved in the present Appeal, we deem it fit to decide the Appeal on hearing the Ld. DR and perused the material available on record.
The Ld. DR vehemently submitted that there was no sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay of 626 days in filing the Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), therefore submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has rightly dismissed the first appeal of the Assessee in delay in latches, thus, sought for dismissal of the present Appeal.
We have heard the Ld. DR and perused the material available on record. Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 16.09.2022, the Assessee preferred Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) with a delay of 626 days. As per the Assessee, the cause for the delay in filing the first Appeal was that the Board of the Assessee was dissolved on 31.05.2020, thereafter, no election was conducted and due to Covid-19 situation earlier Board continue on extension and nomination. Thereafter, to run day-to-day operation of the society, one
ITA No.407/Kol/2026 Jhanjra Project Employees Cooperative Credit Society Limited; A.Y: 2020-21 Assistant Commissioner of Co-operative Society has been appointed. Due to lack of appropriate manpower, Covid-19 situation coupled with non-existence of Board of Directors, the appeal could not file on time. However, the Ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay and dismissed the Appeal.
It is expected from the Assessee to file the Appeal on time, if the cause for delay is bona- fide and beyond the control of the Assessee, the same can be construed as sufficient cause. The Hon'ble Supreme Court time and again clarified that the delay in filing the Appeal with sufficient cause should be looked into in a liberal way and shall condone the delay. In the landmark decision in Collector, Land & Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC), the Hon'ble Supreme Court settled the law that the delay when supported by justifiable reasons, must make way for the cause of substantial justice. Considering the above facts and circumstances, we condone the delay of 626 days in filing the first Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and remand the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction to the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the Appeal afresh on its merits in accordance with law after providing opportunity of being heard to the Assessee.
ITA No.407/Kol/2026 Jhanjra Project Employees Cooperative Credit Society Limited; A.Y: 2020-21 7. In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 22.06.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (RAKESH MISHRA) (YOGESH KUMAR U.S.) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 22.06.2026 DP, PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. Pr. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. CIT(DR) //TRUE COPY//
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026