JAYA BALAJEE RREAL MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the submission of the assessee's Authorized Representative and the non-objection from the Department's Senior Departmental Representative. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee company sought to withdraw its appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Assessing Officer had passed an order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed against the order passed under section 154.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM: The present appeal filed by the assessee company is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Hyderabad, dated 27/09/2024 which in turn arises from the order passed by the Assessing Officer (for short, “AO”) under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”), dated 28/06/2022. 2
Shri M V Prasad, CA, Learned Authorized Representative (for short, “Ld. AR”) for the assessee company, at the threshold of hearing of the appeal submitted that as per the instructions he seeks to withdraw the present appeal. The Ld. AR placed on record a letter, dated 02/06/2026, which reads as under:
Per contra, Dr. Sachin Kumar, Learned Senior Departmental Representative (for short, “Ld. Sr-DR”) did not object to the seeking of withdrawal of the present appeal of the assessee company.
3 Order pronounced in the open court on 02nd June, 2026. S /- S /- (मधुसूदन साव"डया) (रवीश सूद) (MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA) (RAVISH SOOD) लेखासद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "या"यकसद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER d/- Hyderabad, dated 02/06/2026. OKK/sps आदेशक"""त"ल"पअ"े"षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-
"नधा"रती/The : Jaya Balajee Real Media Private Limited, Corporate Office, Flat. No. B-208, Western Plaza, Assessee O.U. Colony, Manikonda, Hydearabad -500089 Telangana-500089. 2. राज"व/ The Revenue : The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(3), Aayakar Bhavan, Shakker Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad - 500004. Telangana
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Hyderabad.
"वभागीय""त"न"ध, आयकरअपील"यअ"धकरण /DR,ITAT, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner of Income Tax 6. गाड"फ़ाईल / Guard file
आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER KAMALA KUMAR KUMAR ORUGANTI ORUGANTI Date: 2026.06.02 16:40:56 +05'30' Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Hyderabad.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026