PRADEEP HEGDE,MYSURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), MYSORE, MYSURU
What were the facts?
The assessee, a retired BSNL employee, claimed exemption for ex gratia received under a voluntary retirement scheme. The employer restricted the exemption under Section 10(10C) to ₹5,00,000, while the assessee claimed full exemption. The appeals were filed belatedly, and the CIT(A) declined to condone the delay.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the ex gratia received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019, is in the nature of retrenchment compensation and falls under Section 10(10B) of the Act, making it exempt from tax. The impugned findings of the CIT(A) were set aside.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex gratia received by a BSNL employee under a voluntary retirement scheme is eligible for exemption under Section 10(10C) or Section 10(10B), and whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE PRESIDENT
These are two appeals filed by Mr. Pradeep Hegde, the assessee/appellant, for the assessment years 2020-21 and 2021-22. The appeals are directed against the orders passed by the learnedCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Mumbai [learned CIT(A)], arising from intimations issued under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, wherein the assessee’s claim for exemptionwas not fully allowed.
Briefly stated, the assessee joined the Department of Telecommunications in 1983 and was subsequently absorbed in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL). He retired from BSNL on 1 January 2020 under the voluntary retirement scheme approved by Page 1 of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10C)
- Preeti Dubey, Jhansi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), JhansiITA 439/AGR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Preeti Dubey, Jhansi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), JhansiITA 438/AGR/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Preeti Dubey, Jhansi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), JhansiITA 439/AGR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Preeti Dubey, Jhansi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), JhansiITA 438/AGR/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Makarand Prabhakar Abhyankar, Mumbai vs ITO, Circle 1, KolhapurITA 1497/PUN/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026