SUNDER MEDICAL STORE,LAKHIMPUR KHERI vs. ITO-3(4), LAKHIMPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to personal hardships faced by the partners. It held that the partner remuneration was a genuine business expenditure authorized by the partnership deed and should be allowed as a set-off.
What were the facts?
The assessee's income was assessed at a higher amount than reported due to an addition of partner remuneration. The assessee's appeal to the CIT(A) was dismissed, and the subsequent appeal to the ITAT was filed with a significant delay.
What were the issues?
Whether partner remuneration is an allowable business expenditure and whether the CIT(A) order was passed without proper opportunity to be heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘SMC’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT : V.P. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)/ADDL/JCIT(A), Bangaluru, dated 27.02.2025 pertaining to the AY 2018-19. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. Because on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Bengaluru is bad in law and deserves to be quashed being illegal. Assessment Year:2018-19 2
Because on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Bengaluru has erred in confirming the order passed under section 154 of the Income Tax Ac
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(b)
- M/S Shree Shakuntala Industries, Alwar vs ITO, Ward-1(1), AlwarITA 1396/JPR/2025[2002-03]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2002-03
- Morlidhar B Vamdote, Bardoli vs ITO, Ward-1, BardoliITA 1174/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- M/S Prashant Fruit Company, Alwar vs ITO, Ward-1(1), AlwarITA 1557/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S Prashant Fruit Company, Alwar vs ITO, Ward-1(1), AlwarITA 1549/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Super Fin Services, Ahmedabad vs Income Tax Officer Ward 3(3)(5), AhmedabadITA 1389/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026