SRI ANJANEYA SAMUDAYA BHAVAN TRUST,DAVANAGERE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1, DAVANAGERE, DAVANAGERE
What were the facts?
The assessee is a charitable trust that did not claim exemption under sections 11/12. It filed its return and the CPC processed it under section 143(1), levying tax at the Maximum Marginal Rate (MMR). The assessee's rectification application and subsequent appeal to the CIT(A) were rejected.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is a public charitable trust and not a discretionary trust. Since the members/trustees are not entitled to any share of the income, section 164(1) is not attracted, and tax should be levied at normal rates.
What were the issues?
Whether the income of a public charitable trust, which does not claim exemption and is not a discretionary trust, is taxable at the Maximum Marginal Rate or at normal rates applicable to an Association of Persons.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 164,Section 143(1),Section 11,Section 12,Section 160
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’ BENCH, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The present appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2024- 25 is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) ADDL/JCIT (A)-9 MUMBAI (hereafter- the learned CIT(A)) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter- the Act).
The first issue raised by the assessee in its ground of appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the levy of tax at maximum marginal rate i.e. flat 30%.
The facts in brief are that the assessee, Sri Anjaneya Samudaya Bhavan Trust, is a trust registered on 19.02.2019 at Davanagere, Karnataka. The primary object of the trust is to de
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 164
- Chiragh Social Welfare Society, Chiragh… vs Assessing Officer Ward 30(1) Delhi, DelhiITA 2658/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2024-25
- Lajwanti Moorjani Family Trust, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1193/HYD/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2024-2025
- Choksi Subhdraben Chhotalal, Surat vs Ward 2(2)(1), SuratITA 585/SRT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Choksi Subhdraben Chhotalal, Surat vs Ward 2(2)(1), SuratITA 576/SRT/2026[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2009-10
- Arcil Ast 023-I Trust, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer 21(1)(2), MumbaiITA 1257/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Apr 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pabitra Kumar Prusty vs. The Chief Commissioner , CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Innojet Projects Private Limited, Khorda vs. The Joint Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal) Central Tax And Goods And Services Tax, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Ganjam Galaxy Bhapur Barkatulla Street, Ganjam vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Lalu Kumar Bagh vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Koraput Range, KoraputOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Bhanu Metal Industries And Ors vs. Union Of INDIA And OrsCalcutta · 7 Oct 2026