MADHUBEN RAMNIK NANDU,GHATKOPAR WEST MUMBAI. vs. ITO, WARD 27(2)(1), MUMBAI, VASI RAILWAY STATION BUILDING, NAVI MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice under Section 148 was issued beyond the permissible limitation period, as per the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Rajiv Bansal. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings and the assessment order were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened for AY 2015-16, and a notice under Section 148 was issued on April 6, 2022. The assessee filed a return of income and contested the reassessment proceedings on legal grounds, including that the notice was time-barred.
What were the issues?
Whether the notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16 was barred by limitation, and if so, whether the consequential reassessment proceedings and order are void ab initio.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 149,Section 45,Section 54
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
आदेश की प्रतितलति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
P a g e | 8 ITA No. 1361/Mum/2026 A.Y. 2015-16 Madhuben Ramnik Nandu 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. विभागीय प्रविविवि, आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. सत्यावपि प्रवि //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उि/सहायक िंजीकार (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अिीलीय अतधकरण/ ITAT, Bench, Mumbai. Details Date Initial Designation Sr. No. 1 Draft dictated on Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft Placed before author Sr.PS/PS 3 Sr.PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before the Second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by JM/AM Second Member 5 JM/AM Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS 6 Order pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 8 Sr.PS/PS Date on which the file goes to the Head clerk 9 Date on which file goes to the AR 10 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026