MADHUSUDAN PALA,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 9(1), HYDERABAD
What were the facts?
During a search operation, incriminating documents related to the assessee's investments were found. The Assessing Officer made additions for unexplained investment and advance for sale of land. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeals for non-payment of self-assessment tax.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while payment of self-assessment tax before filing an appeal is mandatory, the assessee has since paid the tax. Therefore, the matter should be remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be admitted if self-assessment tax is paid after the due date but before the appellate authority decides on merits, and whether the assessee is left without an effective remedy if the appeal is dismissed solely on this ground.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad “B” Bench, Hyderabad
PER MANJUNATHA G., A.M : The appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate, but identical orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 12 [in short “Ld. CIT(A)”], Hyderabad, dated 21.08.2025, pertaining to the assessment years 2007-08 and 2009-10, respectively.
The brief facts of the case are that, a search
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Piyush Maheshwari, Kota, Rajasthan vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1529/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 49/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 48/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 47/PUN/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 46/PUN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026