TIBETAN CHILDREN VILLAGE,DHARAMSHALA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) failed to confront the assessee with specific issues regarding its religious nature and did not conduct a factual examination of financial statements. The denial of 80G approval was also found to be lacking factual basis.
What were the facts?
The assessee-trust, Tibetan Children Village, sought registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G. The CIT(Exemptions) granted registration classifying the assessee as a 'Religious Entity' and denied 80G approval, citing religious activities in its object clause.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was correctly classified as a 'Religious Entity' for 12AB registration and whether the denial of 80G approval was justified without proper factual examination.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “B”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: HYBRID MODE BEFORE: SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & SH. RAJESH DAMODARLAL SHARMA, JM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 551/Chd/2026 U/s 12AB(1)(b)(II) बनाम Tibetan Children Village, The CIT(Exemptions), Dal lake, Chandigarh Dharamshala 176216 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATT3933B अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 552/Chd/2026 U/s 80G बनाम Tibetan Children Village The CIT(Exemptions), Dal lake Chandigarh Dharamshala 176216 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATT3933B अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Ashwani Kumar, CA a/w Sh. Aditya Kumar, CA & Mrs. Deepali Aggarwal, CA – Ld. ARs राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Sh. Anshuman Sharma, CIT DR (Virtual mode)
सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18.08.2026 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 19.08.2026 आदेश/Order PER RAJESH DAMODARLAL SHARMA, J.M:
Aforesaid appeals by assessee are connected appeals. First, we take up ITA No.551/Chandi/2026 which arises out
2 551 & 552/Chd/2026 of an order passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh, [CIT(E)] on 27-01-2026 granting registration to the assessee-
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026