BAL SHIKSHAN MANDIR TRUST,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS) WARD 1(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application for withdrawal of the appeal as the issue had become infructuous due to the subsequent approval. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the rejection of its application for registration/approval under Section 80G. Subsequently, the assessee was granted approval under Section 80G(5).
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed against the rejection of 80G approval survives when the approval is subsequently granted. The issue became infructuous.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M):
The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 02/02/2026 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai, whereby the assessee’s application seeking registration/approval under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been rejected.
2 ITA No.2564/Mum/2026 & 2570/Mum/2026 Bal Shikshan Mandir 2. During the course of hearing, the assessee has filed an application seeking withdrawal of the present appeal vide letter dated 27.04.2026, which is reproduced hereunder:-
“1. The Appellant has filed the present appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal against the order passed under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Subsequent to the filing of the present appeal, the Appellant has been granted approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide order dated 15.04.2026. 3. In view of the aforesaid development, the issue involved in the present appeal does not survive for adjudication and the appeal has become infructuous in view of subsequent approval. 4. The Appellant, therefore, seeks permission of this Hon'ble Tribunal to withdraw the present appeal.”
In view of the above application, we allow the withdrawal of the appeal as the Learned Departmental Representative also does not have any objection. Accordingly the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 20th May, 2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (PRABHASH SHANKAR) (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 20/05/2026 KARUNA, sr.ps
3 ITA No.2564/Mum/2026 & 2570/Mum/2026 Bal Shikshan Mandir Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file. //True Copy// BY ORDER,
(Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026