AMIT KATYAL,NEW DELHI vs. PIYUSH KUMAR KOTHARI, DCIT, CC-27, NEW DELHI
What were the facts?
During a search operation, the assessee's phone revealed details of payments made to Ms. Jwala Gutta and for wedding expenses. The Assessing Officer (AO) added certain cash payments to the assessee's income, treating them as unexplained money.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO made additions based on presumptions without sufficient material or confirmation from the recipient. The evidence found during the search did not conclusively prove the assessee made the cash payments.
What were the issues?
Whether cash payments made to Ms. Jwala Gutta and for wedding expenses are unexplained money and can be added to the assessee's income without sufficient corroborating evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 153A,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 131(1A),Section 69A,Section 56(2)(v)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “E”, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM :
These appeals are filed by the assessee against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-29, New Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 06.10.2025 for the Assessment Years 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2 ITA Nso.7368 to 7370/Del/2025 2018-19. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals are connected, hence the same are heard together and being disposed off by this common order. We take up assessee’s appeal being ITA No.7369/Del/2025 for AY 2017-18 as lead case.
Brief facts of the case are, original return was filed on 30.03.2018 declaring income of Rs.1,10,18,270/-. Search and
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Piyush Maheshwari, Kota, Rajasthan vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1529/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 49/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 48/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 47/PUN/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 46/PUN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026