RABINDRA NATH GHOSH,AGRICO, BHALUBASA vs. ITO WARD 1(1), C.H. AREA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to cooperate and provide all necessary documents for the fresh assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to produce necessary documents before the lower authorities. The CIT(A) decided the appeal ex parte based on the assessee's written submissions. The assessment was passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B due to non-production of details.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was provided with adequate opportunity to present documents and whether the lower authorities' decisions were based on sufficient evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
Per Bench This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 11/12/2025 in Appeal No. NFAC/2016- 17/10146844 for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. Shri Sharwan Kumar Jha, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri Ashish Kumar Deharia, CIT-DR appeared for the revenue.
It was submitted by the ld AR that the assessee could not able to produce the documents before the authorities below. The ld CIT(A) has decided the appeal of the assessee ex parte on the basis of written submission filed by the assessee before him. It was the submission that P a g e 1 | 3 the assessment has been passed u/s. 147 r.w.s.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026