SAT PAUL BANSAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 54 for long-term capital gains on the sale of a property. The Assessing Officer denied the deduction, stating that the sale deed was executed in FY 2018-19, making the gains taxable in that year, and the investment in a new property was made prior to the specified period.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the transfer of property occurred on the date of the agreement to sell, as possession was handed over and full sale consideration was received by the assessee in AY 2018-19. The lien on the property, which caused the delay in the sale deed registration, was resolved before the sale deed was executed.
What were the issues?
Whether the date of transfer of property for capital gains purposes is the date of agreement to sell or the date of sale deed registration, and consequently, the eligibility for deduction under Section 54.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 54,Section 45(1),Section 2(47)(v),Section 53A,Section 2(47)(ii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: HON’BLE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2018- 19arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC [CIT(A)] dated 15-09-2025 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. AO u/s 143(3) of the Act on 27-09-2021. The sole issue that arises for our consideration is qua Long-Term Capital Gains on sale of property and assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 54. 2 AY : 2018-19
The Ld.AR advanced grounds and referred to variou
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 54
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(3)(2), Ahmedabad vs Manan Arati Patel, AhmedabadITA 923/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Rohitbhai Jivrambhai Patel, Vadodara vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(2), VadodaraITA 679/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Rohitbhai Jivrambhai Patel, Vadodara vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(2), VadodaraITA 679/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Dy. Commissioner of Income… vs Thomas Myladiyil Augustine, AhmedabadITA 1131/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Beeram Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Circle -2(1), HyderabadITA 952/HYD/2026[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026