SNT DERIVATIVE BROKING PVT. LTD.,GUJARAT vs. ITO, WARD-24(1), DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the second appeal filed electronically was a duplicate and therefore not maintainable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal physically and later, as a precautionary measure, filed another appeal electronically against the same order. The physically filed appeal was already being processed.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether a duplicate appeal filed against the same order could be entertained by the Tribunal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 07.01.2026, for Assessment Year 2015-16.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee had initially filed appeal against the order of CIT(A) dated 07.01.2026 for AY 2015-16 in physical form. The said appeal was registered as ITA No.6469/Del/2026. Since, appeal papers including Form No. 36 and grounds of appeal were sent through courier, the assessee was not sure of the fact as to whether said appeal documents reached the Registry of
ITA 2491/DEL/2026 SNT DERIVATIVE BROKING PVT. LTD. ITAT, Delhi Benches and the appeal is registered, as a matter of abundant caution, the assessee also filed appeal through e-filing portal of the Tribunal. The second appeal against the same CIT(A) order was also registered as ITA No.2491/Del/2026 (the present appeal). The ld. Counsel submits that the physically filed appeal i.e. ITA No.6469/Del/2026 has already been heard on 06.05.2026 and order is awaited. Therefore, the present appeal is duplicate appeal, hence, the same is not pressed.
In light of the above facts, the present appeal being duplicate appeal against the order of CIT(A) dated 07.01.2026 for AY 2015-16, the same is dismissed as not maintainable.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on Tuesday the 19th day of May, 2026. Sd/- VIKAS AWASTHY JUDICIAL MEMBER Delhi Dated: 21-May-2026 NV
Copy to: SNT DERIVATIVE BROKING PVT. LTD., 606, WALL STREET 1, OPP. ORIENT CLUB, 1 NEAR GUJARAT COLLEGE, AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD-380006, GUJARAT ITO, WARD-24(1), 2 C.R. BUILDING, DELHI-, DELHI 3 THE PCIT / CIT, 4 THE D.R., ITAT, DELHI BENCH 5 GUARD FILE
ITA 2491/DEL/2026 SNT DERIVATIVE BROKING PVT. LTD. TRUE COPY
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I.T.A.T., DELHI
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026