DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs. NATIONAL PAYMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), claimed exemption under Section 11 and 12 for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15. The Assessing Officer rejected this claim, arguing that NPCI's activities of providing payment platform services for consideration fell under the proviso to Section 2(15) and were in the nature of trade, commerce, or business.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the dominant purpose test should be applied, and NPCI's activities were primarily for charitable purposes, even if some surplus was generated. The mere charging of fees for services did not disqualify it from exemption. The Tribunal also found no substance in the allegations of violating Section 13(1)(c)(ii).
What were the issues?
Whether NPCI's activities of providing payment platform services for consideration were in the nature of trade, commerce, or business, thereby attracting the proviso to Section 2(15) and disentitling it from exemption under Section 11 and 12.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI, HON’BLE & SMT. RATNA DASGUPTA, HON’BLE
PER SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Present appeals filed by revenue arises out of the orders dated 18/02/2026 passed by NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Ld.CIT(A)”] for A.Ys. 2013-14 & 2014-15. The grounds of appeal for both the Assessment years are identical except for variance in the quantum. Grounds of appeal for AY 2014-15 are extrac
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Shree Harikrushna Velfare Trust, Bhachau vs The ITO Exemption Ward 1, Rjakot, RajkotITA 677/RJT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8697/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8696/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- M/S. Development Education & Welfare Trust… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(3), AlipurduarITA 2367/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- M/S. Development Education & Welfare Trust… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(3), AlipurduarITA 2366/KOL/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jitin Batra Proprietor Of M/S. Dreamz Conference And Event Management Group vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 60 & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Saraogi vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Howrah And Kadamtala Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 7 Oct 2026
- Neeraj Massey vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Commnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026