KKMS FOUNDATION,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD EXEMPTION 1(4), DELHI, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4269/DEL/2026Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 June 20262 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee should be given another opportunity to be heard on merit. The CIT(Exemptions) was directed to provide a hearing and decide the issue accordingly.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an application for registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application due to non-compliance with notices and lack of proper hearing.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of the registration application under section 12AB without providing a proper opportunity of being heard was justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI

For Appellant: Shri Ankit Agarwal, CA, Shri Gopal Agarwal, CA
For Respondent: Shri Yashvendra Singh, CIT DR
Hearing: 23.06.2026Pronounced: 23.06.2026

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.4269/DEL/2026 (Assessment Years : 2027-28 to 2031-32) KKMS Foundation, vs. CIT (Exemptions), 49, Four Square House, Community Centre, Delhi. New Friends Colony, New Delhi – 110 025. (PAN : AAKCM2667C) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Ankit Agarwal, CA Shri Gopal Agarwal, CA REVENUE BY : Shri Yashvendra Singh, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 23.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 23.06.2026 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM : 1. The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short] dated 19.02.2026 under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). 2. Heard both the parties and perused the material on record. We observed that the ld. CIT (E) rejected the application for registration u/s 12AB of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) on the ground that the assessee did not comply with the notices issued and without giving proper opportunity of being

2 ITA No.4269/Del/2026 heard. In our considered view and in the interest of justice, assessee should be given one more opportunity of being heard on merit. Therefore, we direct ld. CIT (E) to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue on merit as per law. We also direct assessee to make proper submissions and appear before the ld.CIT (E) on the date of hearing and cooperate with the tax authorities. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 3. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 23rd day of June, 2026 after the conclusion of the hearing.

Sd/- sd/- (VIMAL KUMAR) (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated : 24.06.2026 TS

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →