DELHI BLUE POTTERY TRUST,NEW DELHI, INDIA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CIVIC CENTER, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal found that the CIT(E) rejected the registration based on the absence of an irrevocability clause, contrary to a Bombay High Court ruling. The tribunal directed the CIT(E) to provide the assessee with an opportunity to be heard and decide the issue on merit.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Delhi Blue Pottery Trust, applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income-tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application without properly appreciating the facts and material on record.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration under Section 12AB by the CIT(E) was justified, particularly concerning the requirement of an irrevocability clause.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.4251/DEL/2026 (Assessment Year : 2026-27) Delhi Blue Pottery Trust, vs. CIT (Exemptions), 2, Factory Road, Delhi Blue Apartments, Delhi. Safdarjang Road, New Delhi – 110 029. (PAN : AAATD2258D) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri S.L. Deepak, CA REVENUE BY : Shri Yashvendra Singh, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 23.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 23.06.2026 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM : 1. The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short] dated 16.03.2026 under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). 2. Heard ld. DR of the Revenue and perused the material on record. We observed that the ld. CIT (E) rejected the application for registration u/s 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) without properly appreciating the facts, material on record and the submissions of the assessee. We also observed that ld. CIT (E) rejected the registration on the basis of non-
2 ITA No.4262/Del/2026 containing the express clause on irrevocability. We observed that Hon’ble High Court of Bombay had held contrary to the action of the ld. CIT (E) in the case of Chamber of Tax Consultants vs. CIT(E) (2026) 184 taxmann.com 374 (Bom.). In our considered view and in the interest of justice, assessee should be given one more opportunity of being heard on merit. Therefore, we direct ld. CIT (E) to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue on merit as per law. We also direct assessee to make proper submissions and appear before the ld.CIT (E) on the date of hearing and cooperate with the tax authorities. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 3. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 23rd day of June, 2026 after the conclusion of the hearing.
Sd/- sd/- (VIMAL KUMAR) (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated : 24.06.2026 TS Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals). 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026