THE GREGORIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH SOCIETY,DELHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) rejected the application without a proper re-examination of the facts and the provisions of Section 80G. Therefore, the case was remitted back to the CIT(E) for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Gregorian Orthodox Church, applied for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) rejected this application.
What were the issues?
Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) properly considered the facts and provisions of Section 80G while rejecting the assessee's application for registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 3631/DEL/2026 THE GREGORIAN ORTHODOX COMMISSIONER OF SOCIETY INCOME (EXEMPTION) MAR GREGORIOS ORTHODOX DELHI CHURCH, B-2, JANAK PURI NEW DELHI- 110 058 (PAN :AAATT0499C) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY :SHRI YOGESH KOSHI, CA REVENUE BY :SHRI YASHVENDRA SINGH, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing : 22.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 22.06.2026 ORDER PER BENCH :
The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short]dated 15.03.2026 u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’)
Heard both the parties and perused the material on record. We observed that the ld. CIT (E) rejected the application for registration u/s 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). We direct ld. CIT(E) to relook at the facts on record and provisions of section 80G of the Act. In our considered view and in the interest of justice, we remit
2 this issue back to the file of ld. CIT(E). The issue under consideration may be decided as per law.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on this 22nd day of June, 2026 after the conclusion of the hearing.
Sd/- sd/- (VIMAL KUMAR) (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 24.06.2026 Pooja Mittal Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals). 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026