SHRI CHANDI RAM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,GURUGRAM vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2795/DEL/2026Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 April 2026AY 2026-273 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(E) for re-examination, directing that a reasonable opportunity of making submissions be provided to the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee's applications for registration u/s 12AB and approval u/s 80G were rejected ex-parte by the CIT(E). The assessee claimed that notices were sent to an old email ID, and no effective opportunity was provided.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) provided a proper opportunity of being heard before rejecting the applications for registration and approval. Whether the ex-parte rejection was justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “E”, DELHI

Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL

Hearing: 24/04/2026Pronounced: 24/04/2026

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण धिल्ली पीठ "ई”, धिल्ली श्री धिकास अिस्थी, न्याधयक सिस्य एिं श्री मनीष अग्रिाल, लेखाकार सिस्य के समक्ष IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “E”, DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं.2795 & 2796/धिल्ली/2026(धन.ि. 2026-27) ITA Nos. 2795 & 2796/Del/2026(A.Y 2026-27)

Shri Chandi Ram Educational Society, Sheetla Colony, Opp. Sector-5, Gurgaon, Haryana 122001 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant PAN: AADTS-5463-Q बनाम Vs. Commissioner of Income (Exemptions) R.No. 1, 5th Floor, CR Building, Himalaya Marg, ..... प्रधििािी/Respondent Sector 17-E, Chandigarh 1600017 अपीलार्थी द्वारा/ Appellant by : Shri Dinesh Kumar Deshwal & Ms. Pinki Jangra, Chartered Accountants प्रधििािीद्वारा/Respondent by : Shri Dharm Veer Singh, CIT-DR सुनिाई की धिधर्थ/ Date of hearing : 24/04/2026 घोषणा की धिधर्थ/ Date of pronouncement : 24/04/2026 आिेश/ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:

These two appeals by the assessee are directed against ex-parte orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) [in short ‘the CIT(E)’] both dated 18.02.2026 rejecting assessee’s applications for grant of registration u/s 12AB and approval u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), respectively.

2 ITA Nos.2795 & 2795/Del/2026 (AY 2026-27)

2.

The assessee has filed an application for early fixation of the appeals. Considering the short issue involved in the appeals, with the consent of both sides, the appeals are taken up for hearing today itself for final disposal.

3.

Shri Dinesh Kumar Deshwal, appearing on behalf of the assessee, submits that the assessee’s applications for grant of registration u/s 12AB and approval u/s 80G of the Act were rejected at the back of the assessee in ex-parte proceedings. The notice was uploaded on the Income Tax portal and sent to old, non-operative email id of the Chartered Accountant. The current functional email id was updated and was also mentioned in Form No. 10AB, however, no notice was issued to the assessee on the updated email address. Thus, no effective opportunity of making submissions was provided to the assessee by the CIT(E) before rejecting the applications for registration u/s 12AB and approval u/s 80G of the Act. The ld. Counsel, prayed for restoring the matter to the file of the CIT(E) for fresh hearing.

4.

Per contra, Shri Vikram Singh Sharma, representing the Department supported the impugned order and submitted that the assessee failed to furnish relevant documents along with the applications for grant of registration u/s 12AB and approval u/s 80G of the Act. Further, the assessee failed to respond to the notices issued by the CIT(E).

5.

Both sides heard, ex-parte impugned order examined. Considering facts of the case, we deem it appropriate to restore the matter back to the CIT(E) for re- examination of the applications of the assessee for grant of registration u/s 12AB and approval u/s 80G of the Act. The CIT(E) shall allow reasonable opportunity of making submissions to the assessee before deciding the said applications, in accordance with law.

3 ITA Nos.2795 & 2795/Del/2026 (AY 2026-27)

6.

The assessee shall respond to the notice(s) served by the CIT(E), without fail and provide relevant documents for decision on aforesaid applications.

7.

In the result, impugned order is set aside and appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the open court on Friday the 24th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH AGARWAL) (VIKAS AWASTHY) लेखाकार सिस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्याधयक सिस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER

धिल्ली/Delhi, धिनांक/Dated 24.04.2026

NV/- प्रतितिति अग्रेतििCopy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी/The Appellant , 1. प्रधििािी/ The Respondent. 2. 3. The PCIT/CIT(A) धिभागीय प्रधिधनधि, आय.अपी.अधि., दिल्ली /DR, ITAT, धिल्ली 4. गार्ड फाइल/Guard file. 5.

BY ORDER, //True Copy//

(Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, DELHI

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →