THE NIRMAL UJJWAL CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that when an assessee, especially a cooperative society, relies on consultants for litigation, delays caused by mishandling should be considered for substantial justice. The NFAC's reliance on other decisions was deemed not applicable.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the NFAC was dismissed in limine due to a delay of 138 days. The assessee cited dependency on their tax consultant and lack of familiarity with digital procedures as reasons for the delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the NFAC should have been condoned to allow the assessee to contest the matter on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER BENCH:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 24/11/2025 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”) which is emanating from the assessment order dated 25.03.2025 passed u/s. 147 r.w.s.
144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act for the Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19.
On hearing both the sides, we find that assessee’s appeal was dismissed by the NFAC in limine without condoning the delay of 138 days. Learned counsel for the assessee has submitted that the delay in filing the appeal before the NFAC was that assessee is totally dependent on the services of Tax Consultant as the Office Bearers of the assessee were not well conversant with the procedure including handling digital communication. Ld.DR, however, submitted that the reasons cited for delay are not sufficient and the NFAC exercised its powers quite reasonably.
At the outset, it is pertinent to observe that in this matter, the department sought adjournment on the basis that assessee has raised ground No.6 by which the assumption of jurisdiction has been challenged. However, learned counsel for the assessee has submitted that at this stage, the said ground is not being pressed and further submitted that assessee’s appeal has not been considered on merits. 2
We are of the considered view that when an assessee especially status of cooperative society, is operating its functions, it has to be dependent on various persons including Consultants, who take care of the litigation and if a plea is raised before the Ld. Tax Authorities that due to any mishandling of the matter by the employee or Consultant, there was a delay in filing the appeal, the same should be considered for substantial justice and to give an opportunity to the assessee to contest the issues on merits. Various decisions relied on by the NFAC are not applicable to the facts of the present case.
In the light of the aforesaid circumstances, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. The matter is restored to the file of the learned CIT(A) for de novo adjudication on merits as well as on legal issues, after granting the assessee an adequate opportunity of hearing and passing a fresh order in accordance with law.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in open Court on 08.06.2026
sd/- sd/- ANUBHAV SHARMA KHETTRA MOHAN ROY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Nagpur: Dated: 08/06/2026 vr/- Copy to: 1. The Assessee 2. The Revenue 3. The Pr.CIT concerned. 4. The DR, ITAT, Nagpur 5. Guard file. By order Vukkem Digitally signed by Vukkem Rambabu Rambabu Date: 2026.06.09 15:57:28 +05'30' Senior Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026