M/S DHANRAJ CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY,JABALPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-II, JABALPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as they had become infructuous due to settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) concerning late filing fees under Section 234E for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15. The assessee later opted for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and settled the demand.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals are maintainable after settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The applicability of Section 234E for the relevant assessment years was also a ground.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “SMC”, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.:
These two appeals, filed by the assessee, against the common order dated 09/02/2023 of learned Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred as the “Ld. CIT(A)”]/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) for the A.Y. 2013-14 & A.Y. 2014-15. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeals: -
“ITA. No.198/JAB/2025
The Ld. CIT(A) has not considered the appeal on merit wherein facts and grounds were identically supported and has dismissed the appeal ex-party. On the facts and circumstances and legal position of the case the order of charging late filing fee u/s 234E of the IT Act is contrary
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 234E
- Mulchand Ramkishan Laddha, Pune vs Income Tax Officer (TDS-2), PuneITA 874/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2669/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2668/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2667/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2666/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026