MS. LALA RAMSWAROOP GD AND SONS, ,JABALPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-1, , JABALPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as they had become infructuous due to settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and the department issuing Form No. 5 certifying no demand is pending.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the CIT(A)'s order concerning late filing fees under Section 234E. The dispute was settled under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and the assessee paid the demand as per the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the late filing fee under Section 234E was leviable for the assessment years in question, and whether the appeals had become infructuous due to settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “SMC”, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.:
These two appeals, filed by the assessee, against the common order dated 29/02/2024 of learned Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred as the “Ld. CIT(A)”]/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) for the A.Y. 2014-15 & A.Y. 2015-16. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeals: -
“ITA. No.174/JAB/2025
The Ld. CIT(A) has not considered the appeal on merit wherein facts and grounds were identically supported and has dismissed the appeal ex-party. On the facts and circumstances and legal position of the case the order of charging late filing fee u/s 234E of the IT Act is con
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 234E
- Mulchand Ramkishan Laddha, Pune vs Income Tax Officer (TDS-2), PuneITA 874/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2669/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2668/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2667/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2666/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026