THE PRESIDENT WELFARE CENTER POLICE TRAINING CENTER PANCHMARHI,PANCHMARHI vs. ASSESSING AUTHORITY FACE LESS ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ITARSI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had requested to admit additional evidence before the CIT(A) and that both parties agreed that the matter should be remanded. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for de novo consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file its Income Tax Return and Tax Audit Report within the stipulated due dates. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 6,64,10,940/- on account of unexplained cash deposits under Section 69A. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in rejecting the additional evidence and confirming the addition under Section 69A. Whether reasonable cause existed for non-compliance with audit report filing and notice requirements.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M JOSHI
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
(I) ITA NO.-798/Ind/2025- AY:2018-19
Quantum Assessment
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
THE PRESIDENT WELFARE CENTER POLICE TRAINING SCHOOL PANCHMARHI ITA No. 796,797 & 798/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2018-19
for the sake of convenience & brevity] before this tribunal, as & by way of a second appeal .The Assessee is aggrieved by the order bearing Number:-ITBA/NFAC/S/250
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026