VALAR AND CO,NAMAKKAL vs. ITO WARD 1(6), CHENNAI, CHENNAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, a firm, filed its return of income and later revised it. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for bogus purchases and disallowance of freight expenses. The assessee's revision petition and appeal to the CIT(A) were unsuccessful.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that without rejecting the books of account, the AO cannot make arbitrary disallowances. It also found that the assessee had furnished declarations for freight expenses as per Section 194C(6).
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of purchases was arbitrary without rejecting books of account, and whether the disallowance of freight expenses was justified given the declarations provided.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 264,Section 40(a)(ia),Section 194C(6),Section 145(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
PER S.R.RAGHUNATHA, AM:
This appeal of the assessee is filed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, (in short “ld.CIT(A)”) for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2018-19, vide order dated 24.09.2025 in respect of the order u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 264 / 144B of the Act passed by the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department dated 29.05.2023. :-2-:
The
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Rajeshkumar Shah, Navagam, Udhana vs Income Tax Officer, AdajanITA 283/SRT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Ferosh D Marak, Meghalaya vs ITO, W-1, Shillong, MeghalayaITA 265/GTY/2025[2017-2018]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026