RAJBANSHI LOK KALYAN SAMITI,GORAKHPUR vs. AO , NFAC
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee had been granted 12A registration and 80G approval, which the CIT(A) had failed to consider. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration of the documentary evidence regarding loan application.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable society, appealed against the CIT(A)'s dismissal of its appeal against an AO's addition. The AO treated loan repayment as income, disallowing it as application of income. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal citing non-compliance and lack of 12A registration.
What were the issues?
Whether loan repayment can be treated as income and disallowed as application of income for a charitable institution. Whether the CIT(A) erred by dismissing the appeal without considering the assessee's 12A registration and submitted evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 12A,Section 143(3),Section 250,Section 270A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW ‘B’ BENCH, LUCKNOW
PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 24.11.2025, wherein the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeals of the assessee against the orders passed by the Assessing Officer for the assessment year 2022-23 under section 143(3) on 22.03.2024. The grounds of appeal are as under:- “1. The CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in stating that the appellant "does not have 12A registration". This finding is perverse, factually incorrect, unsustainable in law and contrary to the record, as the appellant is duly registered u/s 12A, and enjoys statutory exemption under sections 11-1
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026