MRS BECTORS FOOD SPECIALITIES LIMITED,THEING ROAD, PHILLAUR S.O, PHILLAUR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, AAYAKAR BHAWAN RISHI NAGAR, LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal CIT under section 263. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel sought to withdraw the appeal as the assessment proceedings pursuant to the section 263 order had already been completed.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against a revision order under Section 263 can be withdrawn if the subsequent assessment proceedings are completed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
आदेश/Order PER LALIET KUMAR, J.M: This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. Pr. CIT, Ludhiana-1 dt. 25/03/2025 for the Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR for the assessee submitted that he seeks to withdraw the present appeal filed against the order passed by the Ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Act, as the assessment proceedings pursuant to the said order under section 263 have already been completed by the Assessing Officer.
The Ld. DR fairly submitted that he has no objection if the present appeal is permitted to be withdrawn.
In view of the submission made by the Ld. AR and no objection from the Ld. DR, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 11/05/2026 मनोज कुमार अ"वाल लिलत कुमार (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (LALIET KUMAR) लेखा सद"/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "ाियक सद" /JUDICIAL MEMBER AG आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ"/ The Appellant
""थ"/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु"/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु" (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च"ीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड" फाईल/ Guard File
आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026