NAVNATH MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,BARAMATI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 2, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument that difficulties in collating data due to director disputes and NCLT proceedings prevented proper substantiation. Therefore, the case was restored to the Assessing Officer for one final opportunity.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a private limited company, failed to file its original return. The Assessing Officer reopened the case based on information of cash deposits and withdrawals, making an addition of Rs. 98,45,000/- for unexplained cash credits. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from substantiating the source of cash credits, and if an opportunity should be granted for further submission of evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 115BBE,Section 139(1),Section 148,Section 147,Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant; प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 2. 3. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘B’ Bench, Pune ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. 5. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Assistant Registrar आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
5 ITA No.840/PUN/2026 Navnath Milk and Milk Products Pvt. Ltd.
S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 24.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before 25.06.2026 3 JM/AM the Second Member Draft discussed/approved by 25.06.2026 4 AM/AM Second Member Approved Draft comes to the 25.06.2026 5 Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS Date on which the file goes to 9 the Office Superintendent Date on which file goes to the 10 A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026