KUDALDESHKAR GAUD BRAHMAN SAHAYOG,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), PUNE, PUNE
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under sections 12AB and 80G. The CIT(E) rejected the application because the assessee failed to obtain prior or post-facto permission from the Charity Commissioner for a loan transaction, which is a requirement under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the failure to obtain prior permission from the Charity Commissioner is a procedural lapse, not a substantial breach, especially since the assessee has since applied for post-facto approval. The matter was set aside to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.
What were the issues?
Whether the failure to obtain prior permission from the Charity Commissioner for a loan transaction is a fatal flaw for obtaining registration under Section 12AB and 80G of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH: MUMBAI
PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M : These are two appeals filed by the Assessee against the respective orders of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune [‘Ld.CIT(E)’], dated rejecting the assessee’s application seeking registration u/s. 12AB(I)(b)(ii) and u/s. 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’).
ITA No. 2426 & 2372/Mum/2026; A.Y. 2026-27 Kudaldeshkar Gaud Brahman Sahayog
During the course of hearing, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee moved its application seeking registration in Form 10AB on 03.05.2025, thereafter, in response to the notices, neces
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8697/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8696/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- S S Shah P M Jariwala N S Damanwala Surat V… vs CIT(Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8678/MUM/2026[2027 - 28]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- S S Shah P M Jariwala N S Damanwala Surat V… vs CIT(Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8677/MUM/2026[2027 - 28]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- S N Shah A N Damanwala B B Dalia Surat V S… vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8650/MUM/2026[2027-2028]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2027-2028
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Bibhasa Jena vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar CommissionerateOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- M/S Otd Logistics Express Private Limited vs. The Commissioner CGST Cx And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Sangram Mallik vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Amitabh Samal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Cuttack 1Orissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Atul Kumar vs. The SuperintendentUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026