PARBATI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,ASANSOL vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), EXEMP,, DURGAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues to the file of the CIT(A) for re-adjudication. The assessee was granted an adequate opportunity of being heard and directed to cooperate.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an ex parte order from the CIT(A). The assessee failed to provide relevant details before the lower authorities.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) was justified and whether the assessee was granted a proper opportunity of being heard.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH,
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN
आदेश / O R D E R Per George Mathan, JM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] in appeal no. NFAC/2014-15/10232296 dated 31.01.2025. 2. None represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Mrinmay Basak, Sr. DR represented on behalf of the revenue.
A perusal of the facts in the present appeal shows that the order of the ld. CIT(A) is an ex parte order and the assessee failed to provide relevant details before the lower authorities. This being so, in the
ITA 576/Kol/2026 interest of justice, the issues in the appeal are restored to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for re-adjudication after granting adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is directed to positively cooperate during the set aside proceedings.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 25/06/2026.
Sd/- (GEORGE MATHAN) न्यधनयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER Kolkata, Dated: 25/06/2026 RS आदेश की प्रनतललपप अग्रेपर्त/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. संबंधित आयकर आयुक्त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. ववभागीय प्रतततनधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण,/ DR, ITAT, Kolkata 6. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file.
BY ORDER,
Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Kolkata
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026