DASS DHARM PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST,DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(E) and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication. The assessee is to be granted an opportunity of being heard and to submit evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application due to a lack of requisite submissions.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) properly considered the assessee's application for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) and the provided documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: MS MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI KRIWANT SAHAY
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE MS MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI KRIWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 5069/Del/2026 Assessment Year 2027-28 Dass Dharam Public Vs CIT(Exemption) Charitable Trust . Vikas Puri S.O. Vikas Puri, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAATD4560E
Appellant by None Respondent by Sh. Rajesh Mahajan, CIT DR
Date of Hearing 23.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement 25.06.2026 O R D E R PER KRINWANT SAHAY, A.M.: 1. The above captioned appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 08.03.2026 passed by the CIT(E), Delhi whereby and whereunder in the absence of requisite submissions made by the applicant in support of the application in Form No. 10AB for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act has been rejected.
Having regard to this particular facts of non consideration of the application U/S 12A of the Act by the Ld CIT(E) in its proper perspective in spite of relevant records having been duly produced by the assessee before him, in order to prevent the miscarriage of justice, we would like to grant a further opportunity to the assessee to represent its case effectively before the Ld. CIT(E).
Thus, the appeal is disposed of by setting aside the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication of the same upon granting an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and upon considering the evidences on record or any other evidence which the assessee may choose to file at the time of hearing of the matter.
Appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 25/06/2026.
Sd/- Sd/- -Sd/- -/- (MADHUMITA ROY) (KRINWANT SAHAY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated:25/06/2026 *Neha, Sr. PS* Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Lalaram Gupta Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 660/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Lalaram Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 659/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026